RS 29:150

225 words·~1 min read·/la/title-29/29-58

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

RS 29:150

§150. Article 50. Admissibility of sworn testimony from records of courts of inquiry

A. In any case not extending to the dismissal of a commissioned officer, the sworn testimony, contained in the duly authenticated record of proceedings of a court of inquiry, of a person whose oral testimony cannot be obtained, may, if otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence mandated by Article 36 of this Code, be read in evidence by any party before a court-martial if the accused was a party before the court of inquiry and if the same issue was involved or if the accused consents to the introduction of such evidence.

B. Such testimony may be read in evidence only by the defense in cases extending to the dismissal of a commissioned officer.

C. Such testimony may also be read in evidence before a court of inquiry or a military board.

D. Sworn testimony that:

(1)Is recorded by audiotape, videotape, or similar method; and

(2)Is contained in the duly authenticated record of proceedings of a court of inquiry; and

(3)Is admissible before a court-martial, court of inquiry, or military board, to the same extent as sworn testimony may be read in evidence before any such body under Subsection A, B, or C of this Article.

Acts 1974, No. 621, §1; Acts 2019, No. 373, §1.