CCRP 798

194 words·~1 min read·/la/798-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

CCRP 798

Art. 798. Causes for challenge by the state

It is good cause for challenge on the part of the state, but not on the part of the defendant, that:

(1)The juror is biased against the enforcement of the statute charged to have been violated, or is of the fixed opinion that the statute is invalid or unconstitutional;

(2)The juror tendered in a capital case who has conscientious scruples against the infliction of capital punishment and makes it known:

(a)That he would automatically vote against the imposition of capital punishment without regard to any evidence that might be developed at the trial of the case before him;

(b)That his attitude toward the death penalty would prevent or substantially impair him from making an impartial decision as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath; or

(c)That his attitude toward the death penalty would prevent him from making an impartial decision as to the defendant's guilt; or

(3)The juror would not convict upon circumstantial evidence.

Amended by Acts 1968, Ex.Sess., No. 13, §1, emerg. eff. Dec. 27, 1968, at 1:00 P.M; Acts 1990, No. 366, §1.