Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Kentucky · Kentucky Revised Statutes

61.9305 Working group on facial recognition technology -- Members -- Duties --

786 words·~4 min read·/ky/61-9305

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Use policy requirements for law enforcement agencies that use facial
recognition technology.
(1)As used in this section:
(a)"Facial recognition technology" means the use of algorithmic comparison of
images of an individual's facial features for the purposes of verification or
identification, unless used for the sole purpose of authentication in order to
access a secure device or secure premises;
(b)"Law enforcement agency" means any:
1. Public agency that employs a police officer as defined in KRS 15.420 or
a special law enforcement officer as defined in KRS 61.900;
2. Public agency that is composed of or employs other public peace
officers; and
3. Elected or appointed peace officer who is authorized to exercise powers
of a peace officer as defined in KRS 446.010; and
(c)"Model facial recognition technology policy" means the model policy
developed and published under this section regarding the use of facial
recognition technology.
(2)A working group on facial recognition technology is hereby created and shall be
attached to the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet for administrative purposes. The
working group shall be chaired by the secretary of the Justice and Public Safety
Cabinet or his or her designee and composed of representatives from the following
organizations as nominated by the secretary and appointed by the Governor:
(a)The Kentucky Association of Chiefs of Police;
(b)The Department of Criminal Justice Training;
(c)The Kentucky League of Cities;
(d)The Kentucky Association of Counties; and
(e)The Kentucky Sheriffs' Association.
(3)On or before January 1, 2024, the working group established pursuant to subsection
(2)of this section shall create and make publicly available a model policy for use by
law enforcement agencies, which shall:
(a)Specify the authorized uses of facial recognition technology consistent with
the law, including but not limited to:
1. How search results using facial recognition technology relate to
establishing probable cause for arrests; and
2. The prohibition of using facial recognition technology to identify a
person participating in constitutionally protected activities in public
spaces unless there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been
committed;
(b)Specify requirements for persons within a law enforcement agency that are
authorized to use facial recognition technology;
(c)Require a law enforcement agency to specify a process for the agency to
document instances in which facial recognition technology is used;
(d)Provide procedures for the confirmation of any initial findings generated by
facial recognition technology by a secondary examiner;
(e)Specify data integrity and retention policies applicable to the data collected by
the organization, including processes that address:
1. Maintenance and updating of records used;
2. A routine audit schedule to ensure compliance with the policy;
3. The length of time the organization will keep the data; and
4. The processes by which data will be deleted;
(f)Specify data security measures applicable to the law enforcement agency’s use
of facial recognition technology, including:
1. How data collected will be securely stored and accessed; and
2. Rules and procedures for sharing data with other entities, which ensure
that those entities comply with the sharing agency’s policy as part of the
data-sharing agreement;
(g)Specify training procedures and processes to ensure all personnel who utilize
facial recognition technology or access its data are knowledgeable about and
able to ensure compliance with the policy;
(h)Specify a process that requires a law enforcement agency utilizing facial
recognition technology to compare a publicly available or lawfully acquired
image against a database of publicly available or lawfully acquired images;
(i)Specify a minimum accuracy standard for face matches in all demographic
groups to ensure nondiscrimination against any demographic group with
reference to a Face Recognition Vendor Test conducted by the National
Institute of Standards and Technology;
(j)Provide a specific mechanism to produce a record of prior uses of facial
recognition technology that can be used to audit and verify images and
information used to make a match of a person; and
(k)Provide a process that addresses the privacy of persons by excluding,
redacting, blurring, or otherwise obscuring nudity or sexual conduct involving
any identifiable person.
(4)A law enforcement agency that uses facial recognition technology shall have a use
policy in place prior to using the technology. A law enforcement agency shall file a
full copy of its policy or any revision of its policy with the Justice and Public Safety
Cabinet within thirty
(30)days of the adoption or revision.
(5)This section shall not apply to a generally available consumer product that includes
facial recognition technology, provided that the facial recognition technology is
intended only for personal or household use. A law enforcement agency shall not
use facial recognition technology under this subsection for law enforcement
purposes.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.