Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Kentucky · Kentucky Revised Statutes

61.103 Definitions of "disclosure" and "contributing factor" -- Civil action by

334 words·~2 min read·/ky/61-103

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

employee authorized -- Evidence. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
(a)"Disclosure" means a person acting on his own behalf, or on behalf of another,
who reported or is about to report, either verbally or in writing, any matter set
forth in KRS 61.102.
(b)"Contributing factor" means any factor which, alone or in connection with
other factors, tends to affect in any way the outcome of a decision. It shall be
presumed there existed a "contributing factor" if the official taking the action
knew or had constructive knowledge of the disclosure and acted within a
limited period of time so that a reasonable person would conclude the
disclosure was a factor in the personnel action.
(2)Notwithstanding the administrative remedies granted by KRS Chapters 16, 18A, 78,
90, 95, 156, and other chapters of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, employees
alleging a violation of KRS 61.102(1) or
(2)may bring a civil action for appropriate
injunctive relief or punitive damages, or both, within ninety
(90)days after the
occurrence of the alleged violation. The action may be filed in the Circuit Court for
the county where the alleged violation occurred, the county where the complainant
resides, or the county where the person against whom the civil complaint is filed
resides or has his principal place of business.
(3)Employees filing court actions under the provisions of subsection
(2)of this section
shall show by a preponderance of evidence that the disclosure was a contributing
factor in the personnel action. Once a prima facie case of reprisal has been
established and disclosure determined to be a contributing factor to the personnel
action, the burden of proof shall be on the agency to prove by clear and convincing
evidence that the disclosure was not a material fact in the personnel action.
(4)Any employee who testifies in an official proceeding shall be afforded the same
protections and rights as the employee who makes a disclosure as set forth in KRS
61.102.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.