Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Kentucky · Kentucky Revised Statutes

21A.192 Procedures for courts participating in pilot project authorized by KRS

574 words·~3 min read·/ky/21a-192

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

21A.190.
(1)A court chosen for the pilot project authorized by KRS 21A.190 shall, subject to
written authorization by the Chief Justice:
(a)Open all or some of its proceedings to the public relating to cases identified in
KRS 21A.190(1), subject to subsection
(2)of this section;
(b)Set parameters for members of the public related to attendance at open
proceedings and the information obtained during the proceedings; and
(c)Establish a procedure to require each member of the public attending a
proceeding not to disclose the name or personal identifying information
regarding any person who is a party to the proceeding, or person testifying at
the proceeding.
(a)A court chosen for the pilot project authorized by KRS 21A.190 may close the
hearing or any part thereof upon motion of a party or upon its own motion if
the court determines that closure is in the best interest of the child, the public,
or for other good cause shown. The party seeking closure shall have the
burden of proof.
(b)In considering whether closure of a hearing is in the best interest of the child
or the public, the court shall give priority to the best interest of the child. The
court shall also consider all relevant circumstances of the case, including but
not limited to:
1. The nature of the allegations;
2. The age and maturity level of the child;
3. The benefit to the child, family, and public of maintaining
confidentiality;
4. The benefit to the public of an open hearing;
5. The effect of confidentiality on the fact-finding process;
6. The wishes of the parties, victims, and the parents of any children
involved in the case; and
7. Whether reasonable alternatives to closure are available.
(c)The court shall make written findings of fact and conclusions of law to
support an order of closure, and any order of closure shall be no broader than
is necessary to protect the interests asserted by the party seeking closure.
(3)Unless otherwise authorized by law, a court chosen for the pilot project authorized
by KRS 21A.190 shall not:
(a)Release any record discussed at any open proceeding authorized by KRS
21A.190, prior to, at, or after the proceeding which is made confidential
pursuant to law;
(b)Permit audio, visual, or other recording of the proceedings by any person who
is attending the proceeding, a party to the proceeding, or testifying at the
proceeding;
(c)Permit any audio, visual, or other recording of the proceedings for official
court purposes to be made a public record, copied, or released to the public; or
(d)Permit any member of the public attending the proceeding, who is not a party
to the proceeding, or who is not testifying at the proceeding, to disclose the
name or personal identifying information of any person who is a party to a
proceeding or testifying at a proceeding, outside of the courtroom.
(4)A person may take written notes during a hearing, as provided in KRS 21A.190, and
remove them from the courtroom following the hearing, provided that no name or
personal identifying information of any minor who is a party to the proceeding or
testifying at the proceeding shall be taken from the courtroom. The provisions of
this subsection are not intended to apply to, and shall not limit the use or
publication of, any information obtained by means other than attendance at a
proceeding authorized by this section.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.