Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Kentucky · Kentucky Revised Statutes

202B.245 ICF/ID review committee -- Procedure when involuntary resident refuses

303 words·~1 min read·/ky/202b-245

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

to participate in treatment plan.
(1)Every ICF/ID approved under the provisions of this chapter shall have a review
committee of three
(3)qualified professionals in the area of intellectual disabilities
appointed by the facility director. This review committee shall have the authority to
review the appropriateness of a resident's individual treatment plan.
(2)Upon the refusal of an involuntary resident to participate in any aspect of the
resident's treatment plan, the review committee shall examine the appropriateness of
the resident's individual treatment plan. Within three
(3)days of the refusal, the
review committee shall meet with the resident and the resident's counsel or other
representative to discuss their recommendations.
(3)If the resident still refuses to participate in any aspect of the resident's individual
treatment plan, the ICF/ID may petition the District Court for a de novo
determination of the appropriateness of the proposed treatment. Within seven
days, the court shall conduct a hearing, consistent with the resident's rights to due
process of law, and shall utilize the following factors in reaching its determination:
(a)Whether the treatment is necessary to protect other residents or the resident
himself from harm;
(b)Whether the resident is incapable of giving informed consent to the proposed
treatment;
(c)Whether any less restrictive alternative treatment exists; and
(d)Whether the proposed treatment carries any significant risk of permanent side
effects.
(4)Upon completion of the hearing, the court shall enter an appropriate judgment. The
proposed treatment shall be authorized if supported by clear and convincing
evidence. If the court denies the ICF/ID the right to administer the treatment in
question, the ICF/ID may discharge the resident, unless an interdisciplinary team of
the ICF/ID determines that an alternative treatment is available and acceptable to
both the interdisciplinary team and the resident and would benefit the resident.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.