Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Kentucky · Kentucky Revised Statutes

160.1598 Renewal or nonrenewal of charter contract -- School performance report

1,153 words·~5 min read·/ky/160-1598

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

-- Reasons for nonrenewal or revocation -- Administrative regulations --
Report of action taken and reason for decision -- School closure protocol.
(1)A charter contract may be renewed by the authorizer for a term of duration of five
(5)years, although the authorizer may vary the term to as few as three
(3)years.
Any variation in the public charter school's term must be solely based on the
performance, demonstrated capacities, and particular circumstances of a public
charter school. Authorizers may grant renewal with specific conditions for
necessary improvements to a public charter school, but may not impose conditions
inconsistent with KRS 160.1590 to 160.1599.
(a)No later than one
(1)calendar year prior to the expiration date of a charter
contract, an authorizer shall issue a public charter school performance report
and charter renewal application guidance to the public charter school it
authorized. The performance report shall summarize the school's performance
record to date, based on the performance framework required under KRS
160.1596 and the charter contract, and shall provide notice of any weaknesses
or concerns related to the school that may jeopardize its position in seeking
renewal if not timely rectified and of any strengths or achievements that
support its position in seeking renewal.
(b)The school shall have twenty
(20)days to respond to the performance report
and submit any corrections or clarification for the report to the authorizer.
(c)Within ten
(10)days of receiving a school's response, the authorizer shall
review the response and issue a final performance report to the school.
(a)The renewal application guidance shall, at a minimum, provide an opportunity
for the public charter school to:
1. Present additional evidence beyond the data contained in the
performance report supporting its case for charter renewal;
2. Describe improvements undertaken or planned for the school; and
3. Detail the school's plan for the next charter term.
(b)The renewal application guidance shall include or refer explicitly to the
criteria that will guide the authorizer's renewal decisions, which shall be based
on the performance framework as identified in the charter contract.
(a)No later than six
(6)months prior to the expiration date of a charter contract,
the board of directors of a public charter school seeking charter contract
renewal shall submit a renewal application to the authorizer pursuant to the
renewal application guidance issued by the authorizer.
(b)The authorizer shall rule by resolution on the renewal application no later than
thirty
(30)days after receipt of the application.
(5)In making charter application, renewal, or other appealable decisions, an authorizer
shall:
(a)Make its decision within established timeframes. Any failure of the authorizer
to act on a charter application, renewal, or other appealable decision shall be
deemed an approval of the requested action;
(b)Base its decision on evidence of the public charter school's performance over
the term of the charter contract in accordance with the performance
framework required in the charter contract;
(c)Ensure that data used in making renewal decisions is available to the public
charter school and the public; and
(d)Provide a public report summarizing the evidence basis for each decision.
(6)A charter contract may not be renewed if the authorizer determines that the public
charter school has:
(a)Committed a material violation of any of the terms, conditions, standards, or
procedures required under KRS 160.1590 to 160.1599 and 161.141 or the
charter contract, and has persistently failed to correct the violation after fair
and specific notice from the authorizer;
(b)Failed to meet or make significant progress toward the performance
expectations identified in the charter contract;
(c)Failed to meet generally accepted standards of fiscal management, and has
failed to correct the violation after fair and specific notice from the authorizer;
or
(d)Substantially violated any material provision of law from which the public
charter school was not exempted and has failed to correct the violation after
fair and specific notice from the authorizer.
(7)An authorizer may take immediate action to revoke a charter contract if a violation
threatens the health and safety of the students of the public charter school.
(8)The State Board of Education shall promulgate administrative regulations
establishing a revocation and nonrenewal process for charter authorizers that:
(a)Provides the charter holder with a timely notification of the prospect of
revocation or nonrenewal and of the reasons for such possible closure;
(b)Allows a charter holder a reasonable time in which to prepare a response;
(c)Provides the charter holder with an opportunity to submit documentation and
provide testimony challenging the rationale behind the closure and in support
of the continuation of the school at a public meeting held for that purpose;
(d)Allows the charter holder the right to representation by counsel and to call
witnesses on behalf of the charter holder;
(e)Permits the recording of such proceedings; and
(f)After a reasonable period of deliberation, requires a final determination be
made and conveyed in writing to the charter holder.
(9)If an authorizer revokes or does not renew a contract, the authorizer shall clearly
state, in a resolution of its governing board the reason for the revocation or
nonrenewal.
(10)Within ten
(10)days of taking action to renew, not renew, or revoke a charter, the
authorizer shall report to the state board the action taken, and shall provide a report
to the public charter school at the same time the report is issued to the state board.
The report shall include a copy of the resolution adopted by the authorizer's
governing board describing the action taken and reasons for the decision and
assurance as to compliance with all of the procedural requirements and application
elements found in KRS 160.1593.
(11)An authorizer shall develop a public charter school closure protocol to ensure
timely notification to parents, orderly transition of students and student records to
new schools, and proper disposition of school funds, property, and assets. The
protocol shall specify tasks, timelines, and responsible parties, including delineating
the respective duties of the school and the authorizer. If a public charter school
closes for any reason, the authorizer shall oversee and work with the closing school
to ensure a smooth and orderly closure and transition for students and parents, as
guided by the closure protocol. If a public charter school is subject to closure,
following exhaustion of any appeal allowed under KRS 160.1595, an authorizer
may remove at will at any time any or all of the members of the board of directors
of the public charter school in connection with ensuring a smooth and orderly
closure. If the authorizer removes members of the board of directors such that the
board of directors can no longer function, the authorizer shall be empowered to take
any further necessary and proper acts connected with closure of the public charter
school in the name and interest of the public charter school.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.