Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Kansas · Chapter 60 — Procedure, Civil

60-219. Required joinder of parties; feasibility.

451 words·~2 min read·/ks/chapter-60/60-219

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

60-219. Required joinder of parties; feasibility.
(a)Persons required to be joined if feasible.
(1)Required party. A person who is subject to service of process must be joined as a party if:
(A)In that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties; or
(B)that person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person's absence may:
(i)As a practical matter, impair or impede the person's ability to protect the interest; or
(ii)leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the interest.
(2)Joinder by court order. If a person has not been joined as required, the court must order that the person be made a party. A person who refuses to join as a plaintiff may be made either a defendant or, in a proper case, an involuntary plaintiff.
(3)Venue. If a joined party objects to venue and the joinder would make venue improper, the court must dismiss the party.
(b)When joinder is not feasible. If a person who is required to be joined if feasible cannot be joined, the court must determine whether, in equity and good conscience, the action should proceed among the existing parties or should be dismissed. The factors for the court to consider include:
(1)The extent to which a judgment rendered in the person's absence might prejudice that person or the existing parties;
(2)the extent to which any prejudice could be lessened or avoided by:
(A)Protective provisions in the judgment;
(B)shaping the relief; or
(C)other measures;
(3)whether a judgment rendered in the person's absence would be adequate; and
(4)whether the plaintiff would have an adequate remedy if the action were dismissed for nonjoinder.
(c)Pleading the reasons for nonjoinder. When asserting a claim for relief, a party must state:
(1)The name, if known of any person who is required to be joined if feasible, but is not joined; and
(2)the reasons for not joining that person.
(d)Exception for class actions. This section is subject to the provisions of K.S.A. 60-223 , and amendments thereto.
(e)Nominee. In an action in which any relief sought would determine title or affect a security interest in real property, a person who is subject to service of process must be joined as a party if the person is a nominee of record on behalf of a beneficial owner of a claimed interest in the property that is the subject of the action. The nominee need not be a party required to be joined under subsection (a)(1).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.