Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Kansas · Chapter 59 — Probate Code

59-30,169.

395 words·~2 min read·/ks/chapter-59/59-30-69

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

59-30,169. Who may be conservator; order of priority.
(a)Except as otherwise provided in subsection (c), the court in appointing a conservator shall consider persons qualified to be a conservator in the following order of priority:
(1)A conservator, other than a temporary or emergency conservator, currently acting for the respondent in another jurisdiction;
(2)a person nominated as conservator by the respondent, including the respondent's most recent nomination made in a power of attorney for finances;
(3)an agent appointed by the respondent to manage the respondent's property under a power of attorney for finances;
(4)a spouse of the respondent;
(5)a family member or other individual who has shown special care and concern for the respondent; and
(6)a person nominated as conservator by the spouse, adult child or other close family member of the respondent.
(b)If two or more persons have equal priority under subsection (a), the court shall select as conservator the person the court considers best qualified. In determining the best qualified person, the court shall consider the person's relationship with the respondent, the person's skills, the expressed wishes of the respondent, the extent to which the person and the respondent have similar values and preferences and the likelihood the person will be able to perform the duties of a conservator successfully.
(c)The court, acting in the best interest of the respondent, may decline to appoint as conservator a person having priority under subsection
(a)and appoint a person having a lower priority or no priority.
(d)The following persons shall not be appointed as conservator unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person is the best qualified person available for appointment and the appointment is in the best interest of the respondent:
(1)A person that provides paid services to the respondent, or an individual who is employed by a person that provides paid services to the respondent, or is the spouse, parent or child of an individual who provides or is employed to provide paid services to the respondent;
(2)an owner, operator or employee of any entity at which the respondent is receiving care; and
(3)a person who provides care or other services, or is an employee of an agency, partnership or corporation that provides care or other services to persons with needs similar to those of the respondent.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.