Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Kansas · Chapter 20 — Courts

20-2916. Method of selection of judges in newly formed districts.

503 words·~2 min read·/ks/chapter-20/20-2916

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

20-2916. Method of selection of judges in newly formed districts.
(a)Whenever a new judicial district is established which includes only a part of a single previously established district or all or parts of two or more previously established districts which used the same method of selecting judges for the districts, the new district shall use the same method of selecting judges for the new district. If the method of selection of judges is nonpartisan, the nominating commission for the prior district or districts shall be abolished and a nominating commission for the new district shall be established.
(b)Whenever a new judicial district is established which includes all or parts of two or more previously established districts any of which used different methods of selecting its judges, the question of the method of selection of judges shall be submitted to the qualified electors in the new judicial district in accordance with K.S.A. 20-2901 , and amendments thereto. The district nominating commission for any prior district or districts which used the nonpartisan method of selecting judges shall be abolished, and, if the new judicial district adopts the nonpartisan method of selection for judges, a nominating commission shall be established for the new district.
(c)Whenever the whole or any part of one or more judicial districts is transferred to and becomes a part of another judicial district and the judges in both the district or districts from which the territory was transferred and the district to which the territory is attached have used the same method of selection of judges, the district to which the territory is attached shall continue to use that method of selecting judges for the district. If the method of selecting judges is nonpartisan, the district nominating commission for the district prior to the attachment of territory shall be abolished and a new nominating commission shall be established for the district.
(d)Whenever the whole or any part of one or more judicial districts is transferred to and becomes a part of another judicial district and any district from which territory was transferred used a method of selecting its judges which is different from the method used in any other district from which territory was transferred or the district to which the territory is attached, the question of the method of selecting judges in the district shall be submitted to the qualified electors in the judicial district in accordance with K.S.A. 20-2901 , and amendments thereto. If the method of selecting judges in the district to which the territory is attached was nonpartisan, the nominating commission of the district shall be abolished. If the electors of the district adopt the nonpartisan method of selection of judges, a nominating commission shall be established for the district.
(e)If the method of selection of judges in any judicial district from which territory is detached is nonpartisan, the district nominating commission at the time of the detachment of such territory shall be abolished and a new nominating commission established for the district.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.