Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Illinois · Chapter 775 — HUMAN RIGHTS · Act 35

Sec. 10. Findings and purposes.

302 words·~1 min read·/il/chapter-775/act-35/10

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Sec. 10. Findings and purposes.
(a)The General Assembly finds the following:
(1)The free exercise of religion is an inherent, fundamental, and inalienable right
secured by Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois.
(2)Laws "neutral" toward religion, as well as laws intended to interfere with the
exercise of religion, may burden the exercise of religion.
(3)Government should not substantially burden the exercise of religion without
compelling justification.
(4)In Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872
(1990)the Supreme Court virtually
eliminated the requirement under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution that government justify burdens on the exercise of religion imposed by laws neutral toward religion.
(5)In City of Boerne v. P. F. Flores, 65 LW 4612
(1997)the Supreme Court held that an
Act passed by Congress to address the matter of burdens placed on the exercise of religion infringed on the legislative powers reserved to the states under the Constitution of the United States.
(6)The compelling interest test, as set forth in Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205
(1972), and Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), is a workable test for striking sensible balances between religious liberty and competing governmental interests.
(b)The purposes of this Act are as follows:
(1)To restore the compelling interest test as set forth in Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S.
205 (1972), and Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), and to guarantee that a test of compelling governmental interest will be imposed on all State and local (including home rule unit) laws, ordinances, policies, procedures, practices, and governmental actions in all cases in which the free exercise of religion is substantially burdened.
(2)To provide a claim or defense to persons whose exercise of religion is substantially
burdened by government.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.