Sec. 17-56. Financial exploitation of an elderly person or a person with a disability.

1,068 words·~5 min read·/il/chapter-720/act-5/17-56-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)A person commits financial exploitation of an elderly person or a person with a disability when he or she stands in a position of trust or confidence with the elderly person or a person with a disability and he or she knowingly:

(1)by deception or intimidation obtains control over the property of an elderly person

or a person with a disability; or

(2)illegally uses the assets or resources of an elderly person or a person with a

disability.

(b)Sentence. Financial exploitation of an elderly person or a person with a disability is:

(1)a Class 4 felony if the value of the property is $300 or less,

(2)a Class 3 felony if the value of the property is more than $300 but less than $5,000,

(3)a Class 2 felony if the value of the property is $5,000 or more but less than $50,000, and

(4)a Class 1 felony if the value of the property is $50,000 or more or if the elderly person is 70 years of age or older and the value of the property is $15,000 or more or if the elderly person is 80 years of age or older and the value of the property is $5,000 or more.

(c)For purposes of this Section:

(1)"Elderly person" means a person 60 years of age or older.

(2)"Person with a disability" means a person who suffers from a physical or mental

impairment resulting from disease, injury, functional disorder or congenital condition that impairs the individual's mental or physical ability to independently manage his or her property or financial resources, or both.

(3)"Intimidation" means the communication to an elderly person or a person with a

disability that he or she shall be deprived of food and nutrition, shelter, prescribed medication or medical care and treatment or conduct as provided in Section 12-6 of this Code.

(4)"Deception" means, in addition to its meaning as defined in Section 15-4 of this

Code, a misrepresentation or concealment of material fact relating to the terms of a contract or agreement entered into with the elderly person or person with a disability or to the existing or pre-existing condition of any of the property involved in such contract or agreement; or the use or employment of any misrepresentation, false pretense or false promise in order to induce, encourage or solicit the elderly person or person with a disability to enter into a contract or agreement.

The illegal use of the assets or resources of an elderly person or a person with a disability includes, but is not limited to, the misappropriation of those assets or resources by undue influence, breach of a fiduciary relationship, fraud, deception, extortion, or use of the assets or resources contrary to law.

A person stands in a position of trust and confidence with an elderly person or person with a disability when he

(i)is a parent, spouse, adult child or other relative by blood or marriage of the elderly person or person with a disability,

(ii)is a joint tenant or tenant in common with the elderly person or person with a disability,

(iii)has a legal or fiduciary relationship with the elderly person or person with a disability,

(iv)is a financial planning or investment professional,

(v)is a paid or unpaid caregiver for the elderly person or person with a disability, or

(vi)is a friend or acquaintance in a position of trust.

(d)Limitations. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to limit the remedies available to the victim under the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986.

(e)Good faith efforts. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to impose criminal liability on a person who has made a good faith effort to assist the elderly person or person with a disability in the management of his or her property, but through no fault of his or her own has been unable to provide such assistance.

(f)Not a defense. It shall not be a defense to financial exploitation of an elderly person or person with a disability that the accused reasonably believed that the victim was not an elderly person or person with a disability. Consent is not a defense to financial exploitation of an elderly person or a person with a disability if the accused knew or had reason to know that the elderly person or a person with a disability lacked capacity to consent.

(g)Civil Liability. A civil cause of action exists for financial exploitation of an elderly person or a person with a disability as described in subsection

(a)of this Section. A person against whom a civil judgment has been entered for financial exploitation of an elderly person or person with a disability shall be liable to the victim or to the estate of the victim in damages of treble the amount of the value of the property obtained, plus reasonable attorney fees and court costs. In a civil action under this subsection, the burden of proof that the defendant committed financial exploitation of an elderly person or a person with a disability as described in subsection

(a)of this Section shall be by a preponderance of the evidence. This subsection shall be operative whether or not the defendant has been charged or convicted of the criminal offense as described in subsection

(a)of this Section. This subsection

(g)shall not limit or affect the right of any person to bring any cause of action or seek any remedy available under the common law, or other applicable law, arising out of the financial exploitation of an elderly person or a person with a disability.

(h)If a person is charged with financial exploitation of an elderly person or a person with a disability that involves the taking or loss of property valued at more than $5,000, a prosecuting attorney may file a petition with the circuit court of the county in which the defendant has been charged to freeze the assets of the defendant in an amount equal to but not greater than the alleged value of lost or stolen property in the defendant's pending criminal proceeding for purposes of restitution to the victim. The burden of proof required to freeze the defendant's assets shall be by a preponderance of the evidence.