Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Illinois · Chapter 35 — REVENUE · Act 635

Sec. 30. Validity of existing franchise fees and agreements.

335 words·~2 min read·/il/chapter-35/act-635/30

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Sec. 30. Validity of existing franchise fees and agreements.
(a)No new franchise fees or other charges for the use of the public rights-of-way, including charges for the recovery of reasonable costs of regulating the use of the public rights-of-way, shall be imposed upon, levied on, or otherwise required of telecommunications retailers by ordinance, resolution, or contract, nor shall any other new charges be required from telecommunications retailers by municipalities from and after the effective date of this Act. Nothing in this Act shall excuse any person or entity from obligations imposed under any law concerning generally applicable taxes or standards for construction on, over, under, or within, use of or repair of the public rights-of-way, including standards relating to free standing towers and other structures upon the public way, nor shall any person or entity be excused from any liability imposed by any such law for the failure to comply with such generally applicable taxes or standards governing construction on, over, under, or within, use of or repair of the public rights-of-way.
(b)Agreements between telecommunications retailers and municipalities entered into before the effective date of this Act regarding use of the public ways shall remain valid according to and for their stated terms, except as to fees or charges waived under Section 5-60 of the Simplified Municipal Telecommunications Tax Act.
(c)The regulation of the terms and conditions upon which poles, conduits, and other facilities located in the public way may be shared by or between telecommunications retailers shall be committed exclusively to the jurisdiction of the Illinois Commerce Commission and the Federal Communications Commission, and such regulation shall not be among the home rule powers and functions described in subsection
(h)of Section 6 of Article VII of the Illinois Constitution. Moreover, no municipality may enter into any contract or agreement with a telecommunications retailer with respect to the terms and conditions upon which poles, conduits, and other facilities located in the public way may be shared by or between telecommunications retailers.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.