Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Hawaii Revised Statutes

PART II.

310 words·~1 min read·/hi/part-ii-61

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

PART II. JURISDICTION
[§583A-201] Initial child-custody jurisdiction.
(a)Except as otherwise provided in section 583A-204, a court of this State has jurisdiction to make an initial child-custody determination only if:
(1)This State is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this State but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this State;
(2)A court of another state does not have jurisdiction under paragraph (1), or a court of the home state of the child has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this State is the more appropriate forum under section 583A-207 or 583A-208, and:
(A)The child and the child's parents, or the child and at least one parent or a person acting as a parent, have a significant connection with this State other than mere physical presence; and
(B)Substantial evidence is available in this State concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships;
(3)All courts having jurisdiction under paragraph
(1)or
(2)have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that a court of this State is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child under section 583A-207 or 583A-208; or
(4)No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in paragraph (1), (2), or (3).
(b)Subsection
(a)shall be the exclusive jurisdictional basis for making a child-custody determination by a court of this State.
(c)Physical presence of, or personal jurisdiction over, a party or a child shall not be necessary or sufficient to make a child-custody determination. [L 2002, c 124, pt of §2]
Case Notes
Discussed: 133 H. 436 (App.), 329 P.3d 341 (2014).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.