Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Chapter 88

§88-43 Persons ineligible for membership.

329 words·~1 min read·/hi/chapter-88/88-43

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§88-43 Persons ineligible for membership. Except with respect to faculty members or lecturers employed on one or more campuses of the University of Hawaii who hold multiple part-time appointments or positions, in such capacities, any of which may be less than one-half of a full-time equivalent but all of which, when added together, aggregate to at least one-half of a full-time equivalent position, the board may deny membership to any class of part-time employees or persons engaged in temporary employment of three months or less; provided that no officer or employee entering service after January 1, 1928, who is entitled to become a member of any pension system under part III shall be entitled to become a member of the system. [L 1925, c 55, §3(3); am imp L 1927, c 251, §§1, 2, 5; am imp L 1929, c 190, §1;
RL 1935, pt of §7922; RL 1945, pt of §703; am L 1955, c 141, §1(c); RL 1955, §6-25; am L 1961, c 181, §2; HRS §88-43; am L 1969, c 110, pt of §1; am L 2003, c 119, §3; am L 2008, c 47, §5]
Case Notes
Per diem employees are included in class of part-time employees to whom agency may deny membership in the system under this section and its implementing administrative rule. Because at least portions of plaintiff's time as per diem judge fell within categories specified in the rule, agency correctly determined that plaintiff did not qualify for full-time credited service under the retirement law. 75 H. 42, 856 P.2d 1227.
Where appellant made year-round contributions to the employees' retirement system
(ERS)as a regular school-year teacher through deductions from her academic-year salary, §88-42.5 and this section did not preclude appellant from remaining eligible for ERS service-connected disability retirement benefits under §88-79 simply because the disabling accident to appellant did not occur while appellant was working in the position that provided appellant's ERS membership eligibility. 140 H. 177, 398 P.3d 766 (2017).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.