Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Chapter 635

§635-27 Examination for cause.

247 words·~1 min read·/hi/chapter-635/635-27

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§635-27 Examination for cause. Each party shall have the right, under the direction of the court, to examine a proposed juror as to the proposed juror's qualifications, interest, or bias that would affect the trial of the cause and as to any matter that might tend to affect the proposed juror's verdict. Each party may introduce competent evidence to show the disqualification, interest, or bias of any juror. [L 1905, c 5, §1; RL 1925, §2416; am L 1931, c 294, §1; RL 1935, §3734; RL 1945, §10110; RL 1955, §231-10; HRS §635-27; am L 1972, c 89, §2B(h); gen ch 1985]
Cross References
Grounds for disqualification, see §§612-4 and 612-5.
Rules of Court
See HRCP rule 47(a); HRPP rule 24(a).
Case Notes
Prospective juror must be challenged for cause before juror is sworn. 5 H. 634 (1886).
Statement of juror though not sworn may be relied upon. 9 H. 622 (1895).
Refusal to sustain challenges for proper cause may result in reversible error. 23 H. 792 (1917).
Examination of prospective jurors upon voir dire party entitled to ask questions which will aid judge in determining whether juror should be excused for cause and also, within reasonable limits, all questions which may enlighten attorney upon question whether attorney should exercise peremptory challenges. 32 H. 543 (1932).
Court's refusal to allow voir dire inquiries into specific possible prejudices of prospective jurors upheld as within discretion. 57 H. 492, 559 P.2d 728 (1977).
Cited: 20 H. 7, 15 (1910).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.