Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Chapter 501

ADVERSE CLAIMS AFTER ORIGINAL REGISTRATION

319 words·~1 min read·/hi/chapter-501/adverse-claims-after-original-registration·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

ADVERSE CLAIMS AFTER ORIGINAL REGISTRATION
§501-186 Registration of adverse claims; notice; hearing; costs. Whoever claims any right or interest in registered land adverse to the registered owner arising subsequent to the date of original registration may, if no other provision is made in this chapter for registering the same, make a statement in writing setting forth fully the alleged right or interest, and how or under whom acquired, and a reference to the volume and page of the certificate of title of the registered owner, and a description of the land in which the right or interest is claimed.
The statements shall be signed and sworn to, and shall state the adverse claimant's residence, and designate a place at which all notices may be served upon the adverse claimant. This statement is entitled to registration as an adverse claim, and the court, upon the petition of any party in interest, may require an approved bond to be filed for the payment of double costs if so taxed, and shall grant a speedy hearing upon the question of the validity of the adverse claim, and shall enter such decree thereon as justice and equity may require.
If the claim is adjudged to be invalid or the bond is not filed, the registration shall be canceled. If in any case the court, after notice and hearing, finds that the claim thus registered was frivolous or vexatious, it may tax the adverse claimant double costs. [L 1903, c 56, §106; RL 1925, §3296; RL 1935, §5094; RL 1945, §12694; RL 1955, §342-94; HRS §501-186; am L 2006, c 38, §15]
Cross References
Vexatious litigants, see chapter 634J.
Case Notes
Federal court, based on the language of §501-1, was without jurisdiction to rule on defendant's motion to expunge as it related to plaintiffs' notice of adverse claim. 529 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (2007).
Referred to: 44 H. 235, 246, 353 P.2d 1007 (1960).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.