Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Chapter 23

§23-52 Assessment report; contents.

358 words·~2 min read·/hi/chapter-23/23-52

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§23-52 Assessment report; contents. The report required under section 23-51 for assessing the impact of a proposed mandate of health coverage shall include at the minimum and to the extent that information is available, the following:
(1)The social impact.
(A)The extent to which the treatment or service is generally utilized by a significant portion of the population;
(B)The extent to which such insurance coverage is already generally available;
(C)If coverage is not generally available, the extent to which the lack of coverage results in persons being unable to obtain necessary health care treatment;
(D)If the coverage is not generally available, the extent to which the lack of coverage results in unreasonable financial hardship on those persons needing treatment;
(E)The level of public demand for the treatment or service;
(F)The level of public demand for individual or group insurance coverage of the treatment or service;
(G)The level of interest of collective bargaining organizations in negotiating privately for inclusion of this coverage in group contracts;
(H)The impact of providing coverage for the treatment or service (such as morbidity, mortality, quality of care, change in practice patterns, provider competition, or related items); and
(I)The impact of any other indirect costs upon the costs and benefits of coverage as may be directed by the legislature or deemed necessary by the auditor in order to carry out the intent of this section.
(2)The financial impact.
(A)The extent to which insurance coverage of the kind proposed would increase or decrease the cost of the treatment or service;
(B)The extent to which the proposed coverage might increase the use of the treatment or service;
(C)The extent to which the mandated treatment or service might serve as an alternative for more expensive treatment or service;
(D)The extent to which insurance coverage of the health care service or provider can be reasonably expected to increase or decrease the insurance premium and administrative expenses of policyholders; and
(E)The impact of this coverage on the total cost of health care. [L 1987, c 331, pt of §1; am L 1990, c 227, §2]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.