Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Hawaii Revised Statutes

[§658A-28] Appeals.

442 words·~2 min read·/hi/658a-28

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

[§658A-28] Appeals.
(a)An appeal may be taken from:
(1)An order denying a motion to compel arbitration;
(2)An order granting a motion to stay arbitration;
(3)An order confirming or denying confirmation of an award;
(4)An order modifying or correcting an award;
(5)An order vacating an award without directing a rehearing; or
(6)A final judgment entered pursuant to this chapter.
(b)An appeal under this section shall be taken as from an order or a judgment in a civil action. [L 2001, c 265, pt of §1]
Case Notes
Intermediate court of appeals did not err in concluding that judgment entered on arbitration award was a final judgment appealable pursuant to this section because the judgment was entered in accordance with §658A-25(a), and the language of the judgment was plain and unambiguous that it was a final judgment entered in conformity with the arbitration award that disposed of all claims and parties. 140 H. 381, 400 P.3d 582 (2017).
Where circuit court denied motion to confirm arbitration award and remanded to arbitrator to rehear issue of appropriate remedy, the order denying the motion was not an appealable order and the appellate court lacked appellate jurisdiction under subsection (a). 123 H. 128 (App.), 230 P.3d 428 (2010).
Where arbitrator explicitly retained jurisdiction to decide the merits of the case, stating in the arbitrator's determination that "I hereby find and conclude that the class grievance is arbitrable on its merits and this matter shall proceed to further arbitration for a determination on the merits of a class grievance", the arbitrator's determination was not an "award" pursuant to subsection (a)(3); thus, appeals court could not review the appeal from the order granting motion to confirm arbitration as the order was unappealable pursuant to subsection (a)(3). 124 H. 367 (App.), 244 P.3d 604 (2010).
Although public workers' union was not engaged in arbitration proceedings at the time of the other public union's motion to compel consolidated arbitration pursuant to §658A-7, as the core purpose of the other public union's motion was to compel arbitration, appeals court had jurisdiction under this section over other public union's appeal from order denying motion for consolidated arbitration. 124 H. 372 (App.), 244 P.3d 609 (2010).
As subsection
(a)authorizes an appeal from an order confirming an award or from a final judgment entered pursuant to this chapter, given the express language and plain meaning of this section and §658A-25, appellants were authorized to appeal from either the order granting confirmation or the final judgment; thus, appellants' notice of appeal was timely with respect to the final judgment. 126 H. 179 (App.), 268 P.3d 432 (2012).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.