[CHAPTER 658A]

306 words·~1 min read·/hi/658a

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

[CHAPTER 658A]

UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT

Section

658A-1 Definitions

658A-2 Notice

658A-3 When chapter applies

658A-4 Effect of agreement to arbitrate; nonwaivable provisions

658A-5 Application for judicial relief

658A-6 Validity of agreement to arbitrate

658A-7 Motion to compel or stay arbitration

658A-8 Provisional remedies

658A-9 Initiation of arbitration

658A-10 Consolidation of separate arbitration proceedings

658A-11 Appointment of arbitrator; service as a neutral

arbitrator

658A-12 Disclosure by arbitrator

658A-13 Action by majority

658A-14 Immunity of arbitrator; competency to testify;

attorney's fees and costs

658A-15 Arbitration process

658A-16 Representation by lawyer

658A-17 Witnesses; subpoenas; depositions; discovery

658A-18 Judicial enforcement of pre-award ruling by arbitrator

658A-19 Award

658A-20 Change of award by arbitrator

658A-21 Remedies; fees and expenses of arbitration proceeding

658A-22 Confirmation of award

658A-23 Vacating award

658A-24 Modification or correction of award

658A-25 Judgment on award; attorney's fees and litigation

expenses

658A-26 Jurisdiction

658A-27 Venue

658A-28 Appeals

658A-29 Relationship to Electric Signatures in Global and

National Commerce Act

Case Notes

Where appellant was already bound by an arbitration agreement executed on February 24, 2000, and therefore the post-July 1, 2002 arbitration agreement was not a "new" arbitration agreement that would dictate the application of this chapter to the arbitration proceedings, §658A-3(a) was inapplicable to the case. 113 H. 127, 149 P.3d 495 (2006).

Where arbitration between the State and union representing state employees was statutorily mandated arbitration pursuant to §89-11(e), and not a voluntary agreement to arbitrate, the Hawaii labor relations board had original jurisdiction over the parties' dispute pursuant to §89-14; circuit court did not have jurisdiction pursuant to this chapter because this chapter was inapplicable. 134 H. 489, 345 P.3d 155 (2015).

To the extent that there may be a conflict between the jurisdictional provisions of this chapter and chapter 89, chapter 89 takes precedence over this chapter. 132 H. 492 (App.), 323 P.3d 136 (2014).