Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Hawaii Revised Statutes

[§291E-40] Judicial review; procedure.

319 words·~1 min read·/hi/291e-40

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

[§291E-40] Judicial review; procedure.
(a)If the director sustains the administrative revocation after an administrative hearing, the respondent, or parent or guardian of a respondent under the age of eighteen, may file a petition for judicial review within thirty days after the administrative hearing decision is mailed. The petition shall be filed with the clerk of the district court in the district in which the incident occurred and shall be accompanied by the required filing fee for civil actions. The filing of the petition shall not operate as a stay of the administrative revocation, nor shall the court stay the administrative revocation pending the outcome of the judicial review. The petition shall be appropriately captioned. The petition shall state with specificity the grounds upon which the petitioner seeks reversal of the administrative revocation.
(b)The court shall schedule the judicial review as quickly as practicable, and the review shall be on the record of the administrative hearing without taking of additional testimony or evidence. If the petitioner fails to appear without just cause or, in the case of a petitioner under the age of eighteen, the petitioner fails to appear with a parent or guardian, the court shall affirm the administrative revocation.
(c)The sole issues before the court shall be whether the director:
(1)Exceeded constitutional or statutory authority;
(2)Erroneously interpreted the law;
(3)Acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner;
(4)Committed an abuse of discretion; or
(5)Made a determination that was unsupported by the evidence in the record.
(d)The court shall not remand the matter back to the director for further proceedings consistent with its order. [L 2000, c 189, pt of §23]
Case Notes
As reference to the "court" in subsection
(a)is to the district court, the supreme court is not precluded from remanding a case back to the administrative driver's license revocation office. 110 H. 407, 133 P.3d 1199 (2006).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.