Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Hawaii Revised Statutes

§291E-3 Evidence of intoxication.

623 words·~3 min read·/hi/291e-3

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§291E-3 Evidence of intoxication.
(a)In any criminal prosecution for a violation of section 291E-61 or 291E-61.5 or in any proceeding under part III:
(1).08 or more grams of alcohol per one hundred milliliters or cubic centimeters of the person's blood;
(2).08 or more grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of the person's breath; or
(3)The presence of one or more drugs in an amount sufficient to impair the person's ability to operate a vehicle in a careful and prudent manner,
within three hours after the time of the alleged violation as shown by chemical analysis or other approved analytical techniques of the person's blood, breath, or urine shall be competent evidence that the person was under the influence of an intoxicant at the time of the alleged violation.
(b)In any criminal prosecution for a violation of section 291E-61 or 291E-61.5, the amount of alcohol found in the defendant's blood or breath within three hours after the time of the alleged violation as shown by chemical analysis or other approved analytical techniques of the defendant's blood or breath shall be competent evidence concerning whether the defendant was under the influence of an intoxicant at the time of the alleged violation and shall give rise to the following presumptions:
(1)If there were .05 or less grams of alcohol per one hundred milliliters or cubic centimeters of defendant's blood or .05 or less grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of defendant's breath, it shall be presumed that the defendant was not under the influence of alcohol at the time of the alleged violation; and
(2)If there were in excess of .05 grams of alcohol per one hundred milliliters or cubic centimeters of defendant's blood or .05 grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of defendant's breath, but less than .08 grams of alcohol per one hundred milliliters or cubic centimeters of defendant's blood or .08 grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of defendant's breath, that fact may be considered with other competent evidence in determining whether the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the alleged violation, but shall not of itself give rise to any presumption.
(c)In any criminal prosecution for a violation of section 291E-61 or in any proceeding under part III:
(1).15 or more grams of alcohol per one hundred milliliters or cubic centimeters of the person's blood; or
(2).15 or more grams of alcohol per two hundred ten liters of the person's breath,
within three hours after the time of the alleged violation as shown by chemical analysis or other approved analytical techniques of the person's blood or breath shall be competent evidence that the person was a highly intoxicated driver at the time of the alleged violation.
(d)Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting the introduction, in any criminal proceeding for a violation under section 291E-61 or 291E-61.5 or in any proceeding under part III, of relevant evidence of a person's alcohol concentration or drug content obtained more than three hours after an alleged violation; provided that the evidence is offered in compliance with the Hawaii rules of evidence. [L 2000, c 189, pt of §23; am L 2004, c 90, §3; am L 2007, c 198, §2; am L 2010, c 166, §6; am L 2021, c 216, §2]
Case Notes
Where a plain reading of this section indicates that the phrase "any proceeding under part III" refers to administrative license revocations, trial court erred in upholding hearing officer's ruling that subsection
(c)applies only to criminal prosecutions and has no application to administrative driver's license revocation office cases. 109 H. 220, 124 P.3d 965 (2005).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.