Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Hawaii · Hawaii Revised Statutes

§263A-5 Revocation of privilege to operate an aircraft upon refusal to submit to testing.

308 words·~1 min read·/hi/263a-5

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

§263A-5 Revocation of privilege to operate an aircraft upon refusal to submit to testing.
(a)If a person under arrest refuses to submit to a breath or blood test, none shall be given except as provided in section 263A-9, but the law enforcement officer, as soon as practicable, shall submit an affidavit to a district judge of the circuit in which the arrest was made, stating:
(1)That at the time of the arrest, the law enforcement officer had probable cause to believe the arrested person had either been flying or was in actual physical control of an aircraft while under the influence of intoxicating liquor;
(2)That the arrested person had been informed of the sanctions of this section; and
(3)That the person had refused to submit to a breath or blood test.
(b)Upon receipt of the affidavit, the district judge shall hold a hearing as provided in section 263A-6, and shall determine whether the statements contained in the affidavit are true. If the district judge finds the statements contained in the affidavit are true, the judge shall prohibit the person from operating an aircraft from a state or private airport for a period of one year.
(c)Whenever a court penalizes a person under this section, it shall also require that the person be referred to a substance abuse counselor who has been certified pursuant to section 321-193 for an assessment of the person's alcohol dependence and the need for treatment. The counselor shall submit a report with recommendations to the court. The court may require the person to obtain appropriate treatment. All costs for such assessment or treatment or both shall be borne by the penalized person.
(d)The penalties provided by this section are additional penalties and not substitutes for other penalties provided by law. [L 1991, c 274, pt of §1]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.