794.022 Rules of evidence.
324 words·~1 min read·
/fl/title-xlvi/chapter-794/794-022A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(1)The testimony of the victim need not be corroborated in a prosecution under s. 787.06 , s. 794.011 , or s. 800.04 .
(2)Specific instances of prior consensual sexual activity between the victim and any person other than the offender may not be admitted into evidence in a prosecution under s. 787.06 , s. 794.011 , or s. 800.04 . However, such evidence may be admitted if it is first established to the court in a proceeding in camera that such evidence may prove that the defendant was not the source of the semen, pregnancy, injury, or disease; or, when consent by the victim is at issue, such evidence may be admitted if it is first established to the court in a proceeding in camera that such evidence tends to establish a pattern of conduct or behavior on the part of the victim which is so similar to the conduct or behavior in the case that it is relevant to the issue of consent.
(3)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reputation evidence relating to a victim’s prior sexual conduct or evidence presented for the purpose of showing that manner of dress of the victim at the time of the offense incited the sexual battery may not be admitted into evidence in a prosecution under s. 787.06 , s. 794.011 , or s. 800.04 .
(4)When consent of the victim is a defense to prosecution under s. 787.06 , s. 794.011 , or s. 800.04 , evidence of the victim’s mental incapacity or defect is admissible to prove that the consent was not intelligent, knowing, or voluntary; and the court shall instruct the jury accordingly.
(5)An offender’s use of a prophylactic device, or a victim’s request that an offender use a prophylactic device, is not, by itself, relevant to either the issue of whether or not the offense was committed or the issue of whether or not the victim consented.