92.565 Admissibility of confession in sexual abuse cases.

343 words·~2 min read·/fl/title-vii/chapter-92/92-565

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)As used in this section, the term “sexual abuse” means an act of a sexual nature or sexual act that may be prosecuted under any law of this state, including those offenses specifically designated in subsection (2).

(2)In any criminal action in which the defendant is charged with a crime against a victim under s. 787.06 (3), involving commercial sexual activity, or (5); s. 794.011 ; s. 794.05 ; s. 800.04 ; s. 826.04 ; s. 827.03 , involving sexual abuse; s. 827.04 , involving sexual abuse; s. 827.071 ; or s. 847.0135 (5), or any other crime involving sexual abuse of another, or with any attempt, solicitation, or conspiracy to commit any of these crimes, the defendant’s memorialized confession or admission is admissible during trial without the state having to prove a corpus delicti of the crime if the court finds in a hearing conducted outside the presence of the jury that the state is unable to show the existence of each element of the crime, and having so found, further finds that the defendant’s confession or admission is trustworthy. Factors which may be relevant in determining whether the state is unable to show the existence of each element of the crime include, but are not limited to, the fact that, at the time the crime was committed, the victim was:

(a)Physically helpless, mentally incapacitated, or mentally defective, as those terms are defined in s. 794.011 ;

(b)Physically incapacitated due to age, infirmity, or any other cause; or

(c)Less than 12 years of age.

(3)Before the court admits the defendant’s confession or admission, the state must prove by a preponderance of evidence that there is sufficient corroborating evidence that tends to establish the trustworthiness of the statement by the defendant. Hearsay evidence is admissible during the presentation of evidence at the hearing. In making its determination, the court may consider all relevant corroborating evidence, including the defendant’s statements.

(4)The court shall make specific findings of fact, on the record, for the basis of its ruling.