90.407 Subsequent remedial measures.
83 words·~1 min read·
/fl/title-vii/chapter-90/90-407A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Evidence of measures taken after an injury or harm caused by an event, which measures if taken before the event would have made injury or harm less likely to occur, is not admissible to prove negligence, the existence of a product defect, or culpable conduct in connection with the event. This rule does not require the exclusion of evidence of subsequent remedial measures when offered for another purpose, such as proving ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures, if controverted, or impeachment.