Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Florida · Title VII — Evidence · Chapter 90

90.404 Character evidence; when admissible.

593 words·~3 min read·/fl/title-vii/chapter-90/90-404

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(1)CHARACTER EVIDENCE GENERALLY. — Evidence of a person’s character or a trait of character is inadmissible to prove action in conformity with it on a particular occasion, except:
(a)Character of accused. — Evidence of a pertinent trait of character offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait.
(b)Character of victim. —
1. Except as provided in s. 794.022 , evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of the crime offered by an accused, or by the prosecution to rebut the trait; or
2. Evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor.
(c)Character of witness. — Evidence of the character of a witness, as provided in ss. 90.608 - 90.610 .
(2)OTHER CRIMES, WRONGS, OR ACTS. —
(a)Similar fact evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is admissible when relevant to prove a material fact in issue, including, but not limited to, proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident, but it is inadmissible when the evidence is relevant solely to prove bad character or propensity.
(b)1. In a criminal case in which the defendant is charged with a crime involving child molestation, evidence of the defendant’s commission of other crimes, wrongs, or acts of child molestation is admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant.
2. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term “child molestation” means conduct proscribed by s. 787.025 (2)(c), s. 787.06 (3)(g), former s. 787.06 (3)(h), s. 794.011 , excluding s. 794.011 (10), s. 794.05 , former s. 796.03 , former s. 796.035 , s. 800.04 , s. 827.071 , s. 847.0135 (5), s. 847.0145 , or s. 985.701
(1)when committed against a person 16 years of age or younger.
(c)1. In a criminal case in which the defendant is charged with a sexual offense, evidence of the defendant’s commission of other crimes, wrongs, or acts involving a sexual offense is admissible and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant.
2. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term “sexual offense” means conduct proscribed by s. 787.025 (2)(c), s. 787.06 (3)(b), (d), (f), or (g), former s. 787.06 (3)(h), s. 794.011 , excluding s. 794.011 (10), s. 794.05 , former s. 796.03 , former s. 796.035 , s. 825.1025 (2)(b), s. 827.071 , s. 847.0135 (5), s. 847.0145 , or s. 985.701 (1).
(d)1. When the state in a criminal action intends to offer evidence of other criminal offenses under paragraph (a), paragraph (b), or paragraph (c), no fewer than 10 days before trial, the state shall furnish to the defendant or to the defendant’s counsel a written statement of the acts or offenses it intends to offer, describing them with the particularity required of an indictment or information. No notice is required for evidence of offenses used for impeachment or on rebuttal.
2. When the evidence is admitted, the court shall, if requested, charge the jury on the limited purpose for which the evidence is received and is to be considered. After the close of the evidence, the jury shall be instructed on the limited purpose for which the evidence was received and that the defendant cannot be convicted for a charge not included in the indictment or information.
(3)Nothing in this section affects the admissibility of evidence under s. 90.610 .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.