Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Delaware · Title 9 — Counties · Chapter 96. Recorders

§ 9628. Redaction of unlawful restrictive covenant.

550 words·~3 min read·/de/title-9/chapter-96-recorders/9628

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)An owner of real property that is subject to an instrument that contains a provision that is in violation of § 9605(b) of this title, including a governing document of a common interest community, may request that the recorder for the county in which the instrument is recorded redact and strike the provision from the instrument.
(1)Before granting a request made under subsection
(a)of this section, a recorder must submit the request and the instrument at issue to the county attorney.
a. The county attorney shall determine whether the instrument contains an unlawful restrictive covenant in violation of § 9605(b) of this title.
b. The county attorney shall inform the recorder of the county attorney’s decision within 90 days of receipt of the request and the instrument from the recorder, unless extraordinary circumstances apply, then the county attorney has 60 additional days to inform the recorder of the county attorney’s decision.
c. The recorder shall deny a request made under subsection
(a)of this section if the county attorney determines that the instrument does not contain an unlawful restrictive covenant in violation of § 9605(b) of this title.
(2)The county attorney may compile a list of phrases identified as unlawful restrictive covenants in violation of § 9605(b) of this title. Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a recorder may grant a request made under subsection
(a)of this section without further review by the county attorney if the request is in compliance with the list compiled by the county attorney.
(c)A recorder may prescribe the form and required contents of a request under subsection
(a)of this section, but the request must include at least the following information:
(1)The legal description of the property subject to the provision in violation of § 9605(b) of this title.
(2)The type of instrument that is subject to the provision in violation of § 9605(b) of this title and the instrument’s book and page number or instrument number.
(3)A clear description of the provision claimed to be in violation of § 9605(b) of this title.
(1)This section applies to an owner of real property that is part of a common interest community under Chapter 81 of Title 25.
(2)Notwithstanding any other law or contractual provision to the contrary, an owner of real property that is part of a common interest community under Chapter 81 of Title 25 may make a request under subsection
(a)of this section that the recorder for the county in which the instrument is recorded redact and strike a provision that is in violation of § 9605(b) of this title from all instruments affecting real property that is part of the common interest community.
(1)Upon request for inspection, copying, or any other public disclosure of an instrument that has had an unlawful restrictive covenant in violation of § 9605(b) of this title redacted from it under this section, a recorder shall make available only the redacted version of that instrument.
(2)A recorder may disclose the unredacted version of an instrument that has had an unlawful restrictive covenant in violation of § 9605(b) of this title redacted from it under this section only in response to a subpoena or order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.