Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Delaware · Title 10 — Courts and Judicial Procedure · Chapter 71. Criminal Nuisance Abatement

§ 7121. Presumption against closure; vacating closure after abatement of nuisance and proof nuisance is not likely to occur.

322 words·~1 min read·/de/title-10/chapter-71-criminal-nuisance-abatement/7121·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Where the Court after trial determines that a premises or appropriate portion or portions thereof pursuant to § 7111 of this title constitutes a nuisance, the Court shall order the closure of the premises. No such closure shall be granted unless, in the totality of the circumstances, no less onerous penalty is likely to provide for the abatement of the nuisance. Further, no order of closure shall occur if the Court is clearly convinced that any vacancy resulting from the closure would exacerbate rather than abate the nuisance or would otherwise be extraordinarily harmful to the community or the public interest. In determining whether closure is the least onerous penalty, the Court shall consider:
(1)Whether any previously agreed upon abatement plan, consent order, or other steps taken by a defendant have abated the nuisance;
(2)The duration that any nuisance has existed on the premises and whether any court has previously found the existence of a nuisance on the premises;
(3)The severity of the nuisance;
(4)Whether the defendant has the ability to control the conduct on the premises or the ability to abate the nuisance;
(5)The impact of the continuation of the nuisance upon any neighborhood or community organization; and
(6)The position of any community or civic association which represents the communities in which the premises are located.
(b)The Court at any time after trial may vacate the provisions of the judgment that direct the closing of the premises or any portion thereof provided that the defendant submits clear and convincing proof to the Court that the nuisance has been satisfactorily abated and is not likely to recur. In determining whether the nuisance has been satisfactorily abated and is not likely to recur, the Court shall consider the nature, severity and duration of the nuisance and all other relevant factors, including but not limited to those factors set forth in § 7113 of this title.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.