Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Connecticut · Title 36a — The Banking Law of Connecticut · CHAPTER 669* — Regulated Activities

Sec. 36a-760i. Court action based on lender's failure to comply with statutory requirements.

421 words·~2 min read·/ct/title-36a/chapter-669-regulated-activities/36a-760i·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)A borrower who has been injured by a violation of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive, may bring a claim in a court of competent jurisdiction by the date three years after the date of the closing for the following: The greater of actual damages or one thousand dollars; and costs and reasonable attorney's fees, unless:
(1)By the date ninety days after the date of the loan closing and prior to the commencement of any action against a lender under this section, the borrower is notified by the lender of the compliance failure, the lender tenders appropriate restitution and the lender either
(A)makes the nonprime home loan comply with the applicable provisions of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive; or
(B)changes the terms of the mortgage in a manner beneficial to the borrower so that the mortgage will no longer be considered a nonprime home loan subject to the provisions of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive; or
(2)The lender is able to show by a preponderance of evidence that the compliance failure was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid such errors. For the purposes of this subdivision, the phrase “bona fide error” includes, but is not limited to, a clerical, calculation, printing, computer malfunction or programming error, but does not include an error of legal judgment with respect to a lender's obligations under the relevant provisions of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive. In actions where the compliance failure has caused material injury to the borrower, the lender shall also be able to show that it cured the compliance failure or otherwise undertook reasonable remedial steps to address or compensate for the injury; or
(3)The lender and borrower otherwise reach a mutual agreement on an appropriate remedy or curative action.
(b)In addition, the court may grant an injured borrower such relief as it deems just and equitable.
(c)A borrower or mortgagor may assert fraud and any violation of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive, which causes material injury to a borrower as a counterclaim or defense to foreclosure by the date six years after the date of the closing.
(d)Nothing in this section shall be construed as creating or permitting a cause of action or defense or counterclaim against an assignee of a nonprime home loan or other mortgage loan with respect to a violation of sections 36a-760a to 36a-760h , inclusive, by the originating lender or mortgage broker.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.