Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Connecticut · Title 22a — Environmental Protection · CHAPTER 444* — Coastal Management

Sec. 22a-105. Coastal site plan reviews.

497 words·~2 min read·/ct/title-22a/chapter-444-coastal-management/22a-105·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Coastal municipalities shall undertake coastal site plan reviews in accordance with the requirements of this chapter.
(b)The following site plans, plans and applications for activities or projects to be located fully or partially within the coastal boundary and landward of the mean high water mark shall be defined as “coastal site plans” and shall be subject to the requirements of this chapter:
(1)Site plans submitted to a zoning commission in accordance with section 22a-109 ;
(2)plans submitted to a planning commission for subdivision or resubdivision in accordance with section 8-25 or with any special act;
(3)applications for a special exception or special permit submitted to a planning commission, zoning commission or zoning board of appeals in accordance with section 8-2 or with any special act;
(4)applications for a variance submitted to a zoning board of appeals in accordance with subdivision
(3)of section 8-6 or with any special act, and
(5)a referral of a proposed municipal project to a planning commission in accordance with section 8-24 or with any special act.
(c)In addition to the requirements specified by municipal regulation, a coastal site plan shall include a plan showing the location and spatial relationship of coastal resources on and contiguous to the site; a description of the entire project with appropriate plans, indicating project location, design, timing, and methods of construction; an assessment of the capability of the resources to accommodate the proposed use; an assessment of the suitability of the project for the proposed site; an evaluation of the potential beneficial and adverse impacts of the project and a description of proposed methods to mitigate adverse effects on coastal resources.
(d)Municipalities, acting through the agencies responsible for the review of the coastal site plans defined in subsection
(b)of this section, may require a filing fee to defray the reasonable cost of reviewing and acting upon an application.
(e)The board or commission reviewing the coastal site plan shall, in addition to the discretion granted in any other sections of the general statutes or in any special act, approve, modify, condition or deny the activity proposed in a coastal site plan on the basis of the criteria listed in section 22a-106 to ensure that the potential adverse impacts of the proposed activity on both coastal resources and future water-dependent development activities are acceptable. The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed to prevent the reconstruction of a building after a casualty loss.
(f)Notwithstanding the provisions of any other section of the general statutes to the contrary, the review of any coastal site plan pursuant to this chapter shall not be deemed complete and valid unless the board or commission having jurisdiction over such plan has rendered a final decision thereon. If such board or commission fails to render a decision within the time period provided by the general statutes or any special act for such a decision, the coastal site plan shall be deemed rejected.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.