Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · California · Welfare and Institutions Code

§ 14199.74

377 words·~2 min read·/ca/welfare-and-institutions-code/14199-74

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In the event of a dispute as to the status of an employee as an eligible employee, the retention payment amount, or a qualified clinic’s failure to make a retention payment, an eligible employee or a labor organization that represents the employee may write to the qualified clinic and request a review of the employee’s eligibility status, retention payment amount, or the qualified clinic’s failure to make a retention payment. The qualified clinic shall have 30 days to review the request, disclose to the employee the amount received from the department subject to the methodology described in subdivision
(e)of Section 14199.72, and cure any alleged deficiency. In the event the qualified clinic cures a deficiency alleged by an employee, the employee shall not be entitled to any further damages or other relief.
(b)If the qualified clinic does not conclude the review described in subdivision
(a)within 30 days of receipt of the review request, or does not cure the alleged deficiency within 30 days of receipt of the review request, the employee may file a complaint with the Labor Commissioner as provided in Section 98 of the Labor Code, or the employee may file an action in court to recover the deficiency. If the court finds that the qualified clinic is liable for failing to make a required retention payment, or to designate an employee for a retention payment, the qualified clinic shall be ordered to make full payment of the unpaid amount, plus interest at the rate of interest specified in subdivision
(b)of Section 3289 of the Civil Code, which shall accrue from the date that the retention payment funds were transmitted to the qualified clinic by the department as provided in Section 14199.72, or from the date the qualified clinic should have designated the employee for the retention payment. A claim before the small claims court is not subject to joinder pursuant to Section 378 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
(c)Notwithstanding any other law, the department shall not be liable for any payment, interest, damages, or attorney’s fees and costs awarded to an employee pursuant to this section, and shall not be required to indemnify a qualified clinic for any liability the qualified clinic incurs pursuant to this section.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.