Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · California · Penal Code

§ 4497.04

614 words·~3 min read·/ca/penal-code/4497-04

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Money appropriated to the board for allocation pursuant to this chapter shall be allocated as follows:
(a)Funding shall be provided for those projects entitled to be funded under subdivision
(c)of Section 3 of Chapter 444, Statutes of 1984, as amended, and Section 5 of Chapter 1519, Statutes of 1986, to the extent that those projects have not received full funding.
(b)The following additional amounts shall be allocated to the counties for the construction, reconstruction, replacement, or renovation of county jail facilities. These funds shall not be used to supplant local funds directed to previously approved state projects. Nor shall these funds be used to reimburse counties whose match on previously approved projects exceeded the required 25 percent. These funds may be used for allocations specified in subdivisions
(c)and
(d)of Chapter 444, Statutes of 1984, as amended, and Section 5, subdivision
(b)of Chapter 1519, Statutes of 1986.
County
Allocation
Alameda
$ 6,441,198
Alpine
62,541
Amador
0
Butte
1,900,266
Calaveras
0
Colusa
0
Contra Costa
1,420,488
Del Norte
1,317,106
El Dorado
0
Fresno
4,326,606
Glenn
732,094
Humboldt
2,116,523
Imperial
0
Inyo
1,214,025
Kern
9,650,404
Kings
891,687
Lake
1,699,291
Lassen
727,717
Los Angeles
172,682,741
Madera
0
Marin
2,166,458
Mariposa
117,478
Mendocino
1,214,270
Merced
2,446,318
Modoc
181,761
Mono
120,421
Monterey
7,429,146
Napa
358,819
Nevada
1,179,930
Orange
21,723,387
Placer
2,022,123
Plumas
166,775
Riverside
10,476,076
Sacramento
6,299,898
San Benito
1,270,642
San Bernardino
10,874,718
San Diego
32,675,959
San Francisco
17,015,321
San Joaquin
12,377,292
San Luis Obispo
2,033,185
San Mateo
2,452,925
Santa Barbara
2,438,604
Santa Clara
11,780,710
Santa Cruz
2,889,829
Shasta
0
Sierra
119,234
Siskiyou
0
Solano
1,125,732
Sonoma
3,877,521
Stanislaus
3,649,178
Sutter
964,137
Tehama
532,947
Trinity
225,380
Tulare
2,513,889
Tuolumne
677,876
Ventura
14,733,637
Yolo
686,721
Yuba
1,844,691
TOTAL
$387,845,675
(c)If any county declares that it is unable to use the funds allocated to it under this section, or if any county is unable to satisfy the prerequisites for funding listed in Section 4494.10, the amount allocated to the county in this section shall revert to the state, to be reallocated by the board.
(d)If funds beyond those needed for the itemized amounts become available for reallocation, the board shall reallocate those funds under subdivision (e).
(e)Reverted funds under this chapter or subdivision
(c)of Chapter 1519 of the Statutes of 1986 shall be reallocated to counties pursuant to the development and adoption of a new allocation plan as determined by an allocation advisory committee appointed by the board. The allocation advisory committee shall convene upon notification by the board that funds have been reverted. Reallocated funds shall be distributed three times. The first distribution shall occur on December 31, 1990; the second distribution shall occur on December 31, 1992, and the final distribution shall occur on December 31, 1993. If any county seeking funds has not completed architectural drawings at the time reallocation funds become available, the county shall be removed from reallocation consideration until it has completed architectural drawings.
(f)Any county that receives funds pursuant to this chapter or pursuant to Chapter 444 of the Statutes of 1984, as amended, or Chapter 1519 of the Statutes of 1986, that, in the aggregate, total ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or less may pool or combine those funds for the purpose of financing a jail construction project, subject to approval of the project pursuant to this chapter. However, under no circumstances shall the pooling of successive bond allocations relieve or exempt the county from its obligation to meet the 25 percent local match requirement.
This subdivision shall not be interpreted as an authorization to utilize allocated funds to reimburse counties whose match on previously approved and completed projects exceeded the required 25 percent.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.