Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · California · Government Code

§ 8290.7

555 words·~3 min read·/ca/government-code/8290-7

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(1)The terms “dependent adult” and “dependent person” are misleading because many of the people with disabilities that those terms cover live independently. These terms can mislead law enforcement officers, social workers, and even crime victims and their families to think that many people with disabilities are excluded from the law’s protections.
(2)The term “dependent” demeans and insults people with disabilities who may need special support and services, but may also have the desire and ability to live independently.
(3)It is a priority of this state to ensure that the language used to draft California laws, including the drafting guidelines for legislation, appropriately recognizes and represents people with disabilities.
(b)It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this act that the terms “dependent adult” and “dependent person” be replaced in code with updated terminology that describes these adults in a respectful way; and that the change in terminology is undertaken in a consistent and comprehensive manner that does not substantively alter existing law.
(1)The commission shall, with input from stakeholders, including, but not limited to, the state protection and advocacy agency designated pursuant to Division 4.7 (commencing with Section 4900) of the Welfare and Institutions Code, complete and submit to the Legislature a study on how to remove the terms “dependent adult” and “dependent person” from California code sections, including, but not limited to, code sections that use the term “dependent” in conjunction with the term “elder” to describe the physical or financial abuse of persons who are elders or persons with a disability, including, but not limited to, the Penal Code, Welfare and Institutions Code, and Civil Code.
(2)As part of the study, the commission shall convene a working group that includes, but is not limited to, all of the following:
(A)The state protection and advocacy agency.
(B)The State Department of Social Services.
(C)Groups representing persons who are described by the current definitions of “dependent adults” and “dependent persons.”
(D)Persons who are described by the current definitions of “dependent adults” or “dependent persons.”
(3)The study shall identify all existing California code sections regarding persons who meet the definition of “dependent adult” and “dependent person” that should be amended in accordance with this subdivision.
(4)The study shall include recommendations on how to revise existing California code sections in order to remove “dependent adult” and “dependent person” and replace those terms with new terminology in a manner that would describe these adults in a respectful way and that would preserve the legal rights and protections of both of the following groups of persons in a comprehensive and consistent manner:
(A)Persons who meet the definition of “dependent adult” and “dependent person” as currently recognized in statute, regulation, and case law.
(B)Persons who do not meet the definition of “dependent adult” and “dependent person” but are described in conjunction with such persons, including elders who are protected by laws governing “elder and dependent adult abuse.”
(1)The requirement for submitting the study imposed under subdivision
(c)is inoperative on January 1, 2029, pursuant to Section 10231.5 of the Government Code.
(2)The study to be submitted pursuant to subdivision
(c)shall be submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.