§ 92032.5
344 words·~2 min read·
/ca/education-code/92032-5A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)It is the intent of the Legislature that no proposal relating to the salary, benefits, perquisites, severance payments (except those made in connection with a dismissal or a litigation settlement), or retirement benefits, or any other form of compensation paid to an officer of the University of California shall become effective unless both of the following occur:
(A)Notice of the meeting at which the proposal is to be considered has been given to each regent.
(B)Information and materials regarding the proposal, including a full disclosure of the fiscal impact, have been made available to each regent in advance of the meeting at which the proposal is to be considered.
(C)The fact that the board of regents intends to vote on a proposal concerning the compensation of an officer has been displayed in the meeting notice made available to the public in accordance with the requirements of Article 9 (commencing with Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Government Code or, in the case of a special meeting, in accordance with subdivision
(a)of Section 92032.
(D)The specific proposal has been made available, prior to the commencement of the open session of the regents at which adoption of the proposal is to be considered, to members of the public present at the open session. The proposal shall be acted upon by the regents as the final open session item for action.
(2)The proposal has been approved by the making of a motion and its adoption by a majority vote of the regents present at an open session. Nothing in this section shall preclude in open session the full discussion of the contents of the motion or the reasons why it should or should not be adopted.
(b)As used in this section, “officer” means each principal officer of the Regents of the University of California and the officers of the university, as listed in Figure 9 on page F-37 of the Analysis of the 1993–94 Budget Bill by the Legislative Analyst’s office.