Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 119th Congress · H.R. 7662 (Introduced in House) — To enhance safety requirements for trains transporting hazardous materials, and for other purposes. · Sec. 114

Sec. 114. GAO report on roadway worker protections

315 words·~1 min read·/bill/119/hr/7662/ih/section-114·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— conduct a review of currently available technologies for roadway workers (as defined in section 214.7 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations) with protection from the hazards of being struck by a train or other on-track equipment in the United States; and submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that summarizes the results of the review conducted under subparagraph (a), including recommendations, as the Comptroller General considers appropriate.
The report submitted under subsection (a)(2) shall— describe the frequency, type, and causes of incidences within the rail right-of-way associated with roadway workers being struck by a train or other on-track equipment, based on available data, including whether individuals were acting in compliance with the applicable rules, policies, procedures, and practices; describe the types of technologies referenced in subsection (a)(1) that are designed to reduce risk of injury and death when deployed as a secondary warning system to the standard operating procedures of a rail carrier, including for each technology— the primary function and features; the maturity, implementation readiness, and user experience; the frequency of implementation; any costs, including up front and ongoing maintenance costs, of the technology and other costs associated with the technology; safety benefits associated with the technology relative to current rules, policies, procedures, and practices; and ability to enhance protections for roadway workers without negatively impacting operational or network efficiencies; discuss the potential for such technologies to reduce or eliminate roadway worker accidents occurring within the rail right-of-way; describe any challenges or barriers to adoption of such safety technologies, including operational, technical, and network efficiency challenges or barriers; and assess the cost-beneficial nature of utilizing such technology as a secondary warning system.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.