Sec. 2. Clarifying the Authorities of the Civil Rights Cold Case Review Board
234 words·~1 min read·
/bill/119/hr/3087/ih/section-2A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
It is the sense of Congress that all records of the Federal Government and State and local governments concerning civil rights cold cases should— carry a presumption of immediate disclosure; and eventually be disclosed to enable the public to become fully informed about the history surrounding the cases. Section 3 of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 ( 44 U.S.C. 2107 note; Public Law 115–426 ) is amended by adding at the end the following: Upon request of a State or local government to the Review Board, the Review Board may reimburse the State or local government in full for any expense incurred by the State or local government for digitizing, photocopying, or mailing a civil rights cold case record for the purpose of transmitting such record to the Archivist for inclusion in the Collection. .
Section 3(a)(2)(A)(i) of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 ( 44 U.S.C. 2107 note; Public Law 115–426 ) is amended by striking , except in the case of a State or local government . Section 9(a)(2) of the Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection Act of 2018 ( 44 U.S.C. 2107 note; Public Law 115–426 ) is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting , except in the case of information contained in a civil rights cold case record created on or before January 1, 1990. .
Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Clarifying the Authorities of the Civil Rights Cold Case Review Board
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources