Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 118th Congress · S. 2670 (Introduced in Senate) — To regulate market concentration and competition in the food and agriculture industry, and for other purposes. · Sec. 102

Sec. 102. Retroactive review of large agribusiness, food and beverage manufacturing, and grocery retail mergers

383 words·~2 min read·/bill/118/s/2670/is/section-102·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission shall review each merger that the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission have reviewed since January 1, 2006, that was subject to a premerger notification and waiting period pursuant to section 7A of the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 18a ) in which a dealer, processor, distributor, commission merchant, agricultural input supplier, broker, or operator of a warehouse of agricultural commodities or retailer merged or acquired, directly or indirectly, any voting securities or assets of any other dealer, processor, distributor, commission merchant, agricultural input supplier, broker, or operator of a warehouse of agricultural commodities or retailer.
The Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission shall consider whether to unwind a merger reviewed under subsection
(a)to restore competition, and may so unwind such merger, if the Attorney General or the Federal Trade Commission determines that the merger brought material harm to— competition nationally or in local markets; farmers and ranchers; workers; or consumers. In conducting a review of a merger under subsection (a), the Attorney General shall have the same power as the Federal Trade Commission under section 6(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 46(b) ) with respect to such review. In addition to such other amounts as may be made available to the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, there is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section for fiscal year 2024 and each fiscal year thereafter— $50,000,000 for the Federal Trade Commission; and $50,000,000 for the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. The Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice may use any funds from fines, penalties, and settlements not returned to consumers for their respective future operations. To the extent there are insufficient funds from fines, penalties, settlements, and fees received by the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice for the costs of their respective programs, projects, and activities, there are appropriated, out of monies in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fiscal year 2024 and each fiscal year thereafter such sums as are necessary for the costs of such programs, projects, and activities.
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 102
Retroactive review of large agribusiness, food and beverage manufacturing, and grocery retail mergers
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.