Sec. 2402. Authorized Energy Resilience and Conservation Investment Program projects
374 words·~2 min read·
/bill/118/s/2226/rs/section-2402·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: ERCIP Projects: Inside the United States State Installation or Location Amount California Marine Corps Air Station Miramar $30,550,000 Naval Base San Diego $6,300,000 Vandenberg Space Force Base $57,000,000 Colorado Buckley Space Force Base $14,700,000 Georgia Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay $49,500,000 Kansas Forbes Field $5,850,000 Missouri Lake City Army Ammunition Plant $80,100,000 Nebraska Offutt Air Force Base $41,000,000 North Carolina Fort Liberty (Camp Mackall) $10,500,000 Oklahoma Fort Sill $76,650,000 Puerto Rico Fort Buchanan $56,000,000 Texas Fort Cavazos $18,250,000 Virginia Pentagon $2,250,000 Washington Joint Base Lewis – McChord $49,850,000 Wyoming F.E.
Warren Air Force Base $25,000,000 Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a) and available for energy conservation projects as specified in the funding table in section 4601, the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table: ERCIP Projects: Outside the United States Country Installation or Location Amount Korea K–16 Air Base $5,650,000 Kuwait Camp Buehring $18,850,000 In the case of a utility system that is conveyed under section 2688 of title 10, United States Code, and that only provides utility services to a military installation, notwithstanding subchapters I and III of chapter 169 and chapters 221 and 223 of title 10, United States Code, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of a military department may authorize a contract with the conveyee of the utility system to carry out the military construction projects set forth in the following table:
Improvement of Conveyed Utility Systems State Installation or Location Project Nebraska Offutt Air Force Base Microgrid and Backup Power North Carolina Fort Liberty (Camp Mackall) Microgrid and Backup Power Texas Fort Cavazos Microgrid and Backup Power Washington Joint Base Lewis – McChord Power Generation and Microgrid