Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 118th Congress · S. 2226 (Engrossed in Senate) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2024 for military activities of the Department of Defense for military co... · Sec. 1059

Sec. 1059. Special operations force structure

409 words·~2 min read·/bill/118/s/2226/es/section-1059·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

It is the sense of the Senate that— special operations forces have a vital and increasing role to play in strategic competition in addition to conducting counterterrorism operations and responding to crises; the demand for special operations forces and related capabilities by combatant commanders continues to exceed supply; special operations forces cannot be mass produced during a crisis; most special operations require non-special operations forces support, including engineers, technicians, intelligence analysts, and logisticians; reductions to special operations forces, including critical enablers, would dramatically and negatively impact available options for combatant commanders to engage in strategic competition, carry out counterterrorism operations, and respond to crises; and the Secretary of Defense should not consider any reductions to special operations force structure until after the completion of a comprehensive analysis of special operations force structure and a determination that any planned changes would not have a negative impact on the ability of combatant commanders to support strategic competition, counter terrorism, and respond to crises.
Not later than March 1, 2024, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report assessing the optimal force structure for special operations forces that includes the following elements: A description of the role of special operations forces in implementing the most recent national defense strategy under section 113(g) of title 10, United States Code. A description of ongoing special operations activities, as described in section 167(k) of title 10, United States Code.
An assessment of potential future national security threats to the United States across the spectrum of competition and conflict. A description of ongoing counterterrorism and contingency operations of the United States. A detailed accounting of the demand for special operations forces by geographic combatant command. A description of the role of emerging technology on special operations forces. An assessment of current and projected capabilities of other United States Armed Forces that could affect force structure capability and capacity requirements of special operations forces.
An assessment of the size, composition, and organizational structure of the military services’ special operations command headquarters and subordinate headquarters elements. An assessment of the readiness of special operations forces for assigned missions and future conflicts. An assessment of the adequacy of special operations force structure for meeting the goals of the National Military Strategy under section 153(b) of title 10, United States Code. A description of the role of special operations forces in supporting the Joint Concept for Competing.
Any other matters deemed relevant by the Secretary.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.