Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 118th Congress · H.R. 7958 (Introduced in House) — To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit the Director of the National Institutes of Health from conducting... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Findings

219 words·~1 min read·/bill/118/hr/7958/ih/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds the following: The National Institutes of Health (in this section referred to as NIH ) spends taxpayer dollars to conduct and fund research that causes pain and distress to dogs and cats. The NIH states that animal models often fail to provide good ways to mimic disease or predict how drugs will work in humans, resulting in much wasted time and money while patients wait for therapies . The NIH often conducts and funds tests on dogs to assess the safety of experimental human drugs even though the Food and Drug Administration has stated, The FDA does not mandate that human drugs be studied in dogs. .
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has repeatedly found research on dogs, cats, and other animals that is conducted and funded by the NIH and other agencies to be unnecessary. Alternative research methodologies and other species can replace the use of dogs and cats in NIH-conducted and funded research. Federal agencies including the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Food and Drug Administration have launched initiatives to reduce and replace testing on dogs and cats, specifically.
Existing reporting mechanisms do not provide adequate information to Congress and taxpayers about the scale, scope, and cost of dog and cat use in NIH-conducted and funded research.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.