Sec. 2. Extreme risk protection order grant program
2,073 words·~9 min read·
/bill/118/hr/768/ih/section-2A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
In this section: The term eligible entity means— a State or Indian Tribe— that enacts legislation described in subsection (c); with respect to which the Attorney General determines that the legislation described in clause
(i)complies with the requirements under subsection (c)(1); and that certifies to the Attorney General that the State or Indian Tribe will, with respect to a grant received under subsection (b)— use the grant for the purposes described in subsection (b)(2); and allocate not less than 25 percent and not more than 70 percent of the amount received under the grant for the development and dissemination of training for law enforcement officers in accordance with subsection (b)(4); or a unit of local government or other public or private entity that— is located in a State or in the territory under the jurisdiction of an Indian Tribe that meets the requirements described in clauses
(i)and
(ii)of subparagraph (A); and certifies to the Attorney General that the unit of local government or entity will, with respect to a grant received under subsection (b)— use the grant for the purposes described in subsection (b)(2); and allocate not less than 25 percent and not more than 70 percent of the amount received under the grant for the development and dissemination of training for law enforcement officers in accordance with subsection (b)(4). The term extreme risk protection order means a written order or warrant, issued by a State or Tribal court or signed by a magistrate (or other comparable judicial officer), the primary purpose of which is to reduce the risk of firearm-related death or injury by doing 1 or more of the following: Prohibiting a named individual from having under the custody or control of the individual, owning, purchasing, possessing, or receiving a firearm. Having a firearm removed or requiring the surrender of firearms from a named individual. The term firearm has the meaning given the term in section 921 of title 18, United States Code. The term Indian Tribe has the meaning given the term Indian tribe in section 1709 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10389 ). The term law enforcement officer means a public servant authorized by Federal, State, local, or Tribal law or by an agency of the Federal Government or of a State, local, or Tribal government to— engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of an offense; or supervise sentenced criminal offenders. The term petitioner means an individual authorized under State or Tribal law to petition for an extreme risk protection order. The term respondent means an individual named in the petition for an extreme risk protection order or subject to an extreme risk protection order. The term State means— a State; the District of Columbia; the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and any other territory or possession of the United States. The term unit of local government has the meaning given the term in section 901 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ( 34 U.S.C. 10251 ). The Attorney General shall establish a program under which, from amounts made available to carry out this section, the Attorney General may make grants to eligible entities to assist in carrying out the provisions of the legislation described in subsection (c). Funds awarded under this subsection may be used by an applicant to— enhance the capacity of law enforcement agencies and the courts of a State, unit of local government, or Indian Tribe by providing personnel, training, technical assistance, data collection, and other resources to carry out enacted legislation described in subsection (c); train judges, court personnel, health care and legal professionals, and law enforcement officers to more accurately identify individuals whose access to firearms poses a danger of causing harm to themselves or others by increasing the risk of firearms suicide or interpersonal violence; develop and implement law enforcement and court protocols, forms, and orders so that law enforcement agencies and the courts may carry out the provisions of the enacted legislation described in subsection
(c)in a safe, equitable, and effective manner, including through the removal and storage of firearms pursuant to extreme risk protection orders under the enacted legislation; and raise public awareness and understanding of the enacted legislation described in subsection (c), including through subgrants to community-based organizations for the training of community members, so that extreme risk protection orders may be issued in appropriate situations to reduce the risk of firearms-related death and injury. An eligible entity desiring a grant under this subsection shall submit to the Attorney General an application at such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied by such information as the Attorney General may reasonably require. A recipient of a grant under this subsection shall provide training to law enforcement officers, including officers of relevant Federal, State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies, in the safe, impartial, effective, and equitable use and administration of extreme risk protection orders, including training to address— bias based on race and racism, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, language proficiency, mental health condition, disability, and classism in the use and administration of extreme risk protection orders; the appropriate use of extreme risk protection orders in cases of domestic violence, including the applicability of other policies and protocols to address domestic violence in situations that may also involve extreme risk protection orders and the necessity of safety planning with the victim before a law enforcement officer petitions for and executes an extreme risk protection order, if applicable; interacting with persons with a mental illness or emotional distress, including de-escalation and crisis intervention; and best practices for referring persons subject to extreme risk protection orders and associated victims of violence to social service providers that may be available in the jurisdiction and appropriate for those individuals, including health care, mental health, substance abuse, and legal services, employment and vocational services, housing assistance, case management, and veterans and disability benefits. A recipient of a grant under this subsection, in developing law enforcement training required under subparagraph (A), shall seek advice from domestic violence service providers (including culturally specific (as defined in section 40002 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 ( 34 U.S.C. 12291 )) organizations), social service providers, suicide prevention advocates, violence intervention specialists, law enforcement agencies, mental health disability experts, and other community groups working to reduce suicides and violence, including domestic violence, within the State or the territory under the jurisdiction of the Indian Tribe, as applicable, that enacted the legislation described in subsection
(c)that enabled the grant recipient to be an eligible entity. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this subsection. Legislation described in this subsection is legislation that establishes requirements that are substantially similar to the following: A petitioner, including a law enforcement officer, may submit a petition to a State or Tribal court, on a form designed by the court or a State or Tribal agency, that— describes the facts and circumstances justifying that an extreme risk protection order be issued against the named individual; and is signed by the applicant, under oath. The individual named in a petition for an extreme risk protection order as described in subparagraph
(A)shall be given written notice of the petition and an opportunity to be heard on the matter in accordance with this paragraph. Upon receipt of a petition described in subparagraph
(A)or request of an individual named in such a petition, the court shall order a hearing to be held within a reasonable time, and not later than 30 days after the date of the petition or request. If the court finds at the hearing ordered under subclause (I), by a preponderance of the evidence or according to a higher evidentiary standard established by the State or Indian Tribe, that the respondent poses a danger of causing harm to self or others by having access to a firearm, the court may issue an extreme risk protection order. An extreme risk protection order shall be in effect— until an order terminating or superseding the extreme risk protection order is issued; or for a set period of time. Upon receipt of a petition described in subparagraph (A), the court may issue an ex parte extreme risk protection order, if— the petition for an extreme risk protection order alleges that the respondent poses a danger of causing harm to self or others by having access to a firearm; and the court finds there is probable cause to believe, or makes a finding according to a higher evidentiary standard established by the State or Indian Tribe, that the respondent poses a danger of causing harm to self or others by having access to a firearm. An ex parte extreme risk protection order shall remain in effect only until the hearing required under subparagraph (C)(i). All firearms removed or surrendered pursuant to an extreme risk protection order shall only be available for return to the named individual when the individual has regained eligibility under Federal and State law and, where applicable, Tribal law to possess firearms. Firearms owned by a named individual may not be disposed of or destroyed during the period of the extreme risk protection order without the consent of the named individual. A State or Tribal court that issues an extreme risk protection order shall notify the Attorney General or the comparable State or Tribal agency, as applicable, of the order as soon as practicable or within a designated period of time. A State or Tribal court shall submit a notification under subclause
(I)in an electronic format, in a manner prescribed by the Attorney General or the comparable State or Tribal agency. As soon as practicable or within the time period designated by State or Tribal law after receiving a notification under clause (i), the Attorney General or the comparable State or Tribal agency shall ensure that the extreme risk protection order is reflected in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. Legislation described in this subsection may— provide procedures for the termination of an extreme risk protection order; provide procedures for the renewal of an extreme risk protection order; establish burdens and standards of proof for issuance of orders described in paragraph
(1)that are substantially similar to or higher than the burdens and standards of proof set forth in that paragraph; limit the individuals who may submit a petition described in paragraph (1), provided that, at a minimum, 1 or more law enforcement officers are authorized to do so; and include any other authorizations or requirements that the State or Tribal authorities determine appropriate. Not later than 1 year after the date on which an eligible entity receives a grant under subsection (b), and annually thereafter for the duration of the grant period, the entity shall submit to the Attorney General a report that includes, with respect to the preceding year— the number of petitions for ex parte extreme risk protection orders filed, as well as the number of such orders issued and the number denied, disaggregated by— the jurisdiction; the individual authorized under State or Tribal law to petition for an extreme risk protection order, including the relationship of the individual to the respondent; and the alleged danger posed by the respondent, including whether the danger involved a risk of suicide, unintentional injury, domestic violence, or other interpersonal violence; the number of petitions for extreme risk protection orders filed, as well as the number of such orders issued and the number denied, disaggregated by— the jurisdiction; the individual authorized under State or Tribal law to petition for an extreme risk protection order, including the relationship of the individual to the respondent; and the alleged danger posed by the respondent, including whether the danger involved a risk of suicide, unintentional injury, domestic violence, or other interpersonal violence; the number of petitions for renewals of extreme risk protection orders filed, as well as the number of such orders issued and the number denied; the number of cases in which a court imposed a penalty for false reporting or frivolous petitions; demographic data of petitioners, including race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, disability, and English language proficiency, if available; demographic data of respondents, including race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, age, disability, and English language proficiency, if available; and the number of firearms removed, if available.
Connectionstraces to 3
Traces to 3 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources