Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 118th Congress · H.R. 697 (Introduced in House) — To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to clarify that disparate impacts on certain populations constitute a sufficien... · Sec. 7

Sec. 7. Strict vicarious employer liability and Faragher-Ellerth affirmative defense removed

134 words·~1 min read·/bill/118/hr/697/ih/section-7

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 706 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( 42 U.S.C. 2000e–5 et seq. ) is amended by adding at the end the following: An employer shall be liable for any act of discrimination prohibited under this title (including harassment, intimidation, or retaliation) committed by any of its employees. It shall not be a defense to a claim under this title or provide a basis for challenging the application or enforcement of this title— that an employer exercised reasonable care in attempting to prevent or took corrective action regarding any act of discrimination on the basis of sex (including intimidation, harassment, or retaliation); that adverse employment action was not taken by such an employer; or that an employee affected by that act did not take advantage of preventive opportunities to avoid harm. .
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 42 USC 2000e–5
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 7
Strict vicarious employer liability and Faragher-Ellerth affirmative defense removed
Cite42 USC 2000e–5
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.