Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 118th Congress · H.R. 6092 (Introduced in House) — To regulate law enforcement use of facial recognition technology, and for other purposes. · Sec. 106

Sec. 106. Accuracy and bias testing

407 words·~2 min read·/bill/118/hr/6092/ih/section-106·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

No investigative or law enforcement officers may use a facial recognition system or information derived from it unless that system is annually submitted to the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s benchmark facial recognition test for law enforcement to determine— the accuracy of the system; and whether the accuracy of the system varies significantly on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender or age. No investigative or law enforcement officers may begin using a new facial recognition system or information derived from it unless that system is first submitted to independent testing to determine— the accuracy of the system; and whether the accuracy of the system varies significantly on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, or age.
Any investigative or law enforcement officer may not use facial recognition that has not achieved a sufficiently high level of accuracy, including in terms of overall accuracy and variance on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, or age, as determined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, on its annual benchmark test for law enforcement use. No investigative or law enforcement agencies may use a facial recognition system or information derived from it unless that system is annually submitted to operational testing conducted by an independent entity, in accordance with National Institute of Standards and Technology’s training protocol for operational testing, to determine— the accuracy of the system; the impact of human reviewers on system accuracy; and whether the accuracy of the system varies significantly on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, or age.
A summary of the findings of the tests required by subsection
(a)or
(d)shall be submitted to the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts and posted on the internet website of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. The Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division shall issue a rule that establishes what is a sufficiently high level of accuracy for a facial recognition system used by law enforcement, including in terms of overall accuracy and variance on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, and age. The Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division shall consult with outside experts in civil rights, civil liberties, racial justice, data privacy, bioethics, law enforcement, public defense, and forensic science and other relevant areas of expertise in drafting the proposed rule. This section shall take effect 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.