Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 118th Congress · H.R. 4790 (Engrossed in House) — To amend the Federal securities laws with respect to the materiality of disclosure requirements, to establish the Pub... · Sec. 3501

Sec. 3501. Study of certain issues with respect to shareholder proposals, proxy advisory firms, and the proxy process

431 words·~2 min read·/bill/118/hr/4790/eh/section-3501·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 4(j) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78d(j) ) is amended by adding at the end the following: Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, and every 5 years thereafter, the Commission shall conduct a comprehensive study on shareholder proposals, proxy advisory firms, and the proxy process. The studies required under subparagraph
(A)shall cover— the previous 10 years, with respect to the initial study; and the previous 5 years, with respect to each other study. Each study required under subparagraph
(A)shall address the following issues: The financial and other incentives and obligations of all groups involved in the proxy process. A consideration of whether financial and other incentives have created a process that no longer serves the economic interests of long-term retail investors. An analysis of whether regulations and financial incentives have created and protected the outsized influence of proxy advisors or a duopoly in proxy advice, and if so, what are the benefits and costs of that outsized influence or duopoly. The costs incurred by issuers in responding to politically-, environmentally-, or socially-motivated shareholder proposals. An assessment, including a cost-benefit analysis, of the adequacy of the current submission thresholds in Rule 14a-8 (17 CFR 240.14a-8) to ensure that shareholder proponents have demonstrated a meaningful economic stake in a company, which is appropriate to effectively serve markets and shareholders at large. An examination of the extent to which the politicization of the shareholder proposal process is increasing the operating costs of public companies. An analysis of the impact that shareholder proposals have on discouraging private companies from going public. An evaluation of the risk that shareholder proposals may contribute to the balkanization of the U.S. economy over time. A thorough assessment of the economic analysis, if any, conducted by proxy advisory firms and institutional shareholders when recommending or voting in favor of shareholder proposals. A review of the extent to which institutional investors, who owe fiduciary duties, rely on proxy advisory firm recommendations. An assessment of whether, in light of their significant influence on corporate actions and vote outcomes, proxy advisors are subject to sufficient and effective regulation to ensure that their policies and recommendations are accurate, free of conflicts, and benefit the economic best interest of shareholders at large. At the completion of each study required under subparagraph
(A)the Commission shall issue a report to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives that includes the results of the study. .
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 17 CFR 240.14
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 3501
Study of certain issues with respect to shareholder proposals, proxy advisory firms, and the proxy process
Cite17 CFR 240.14
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.