Sec. 206. Reports
328 words·~1 min read·
/bill/118/hr/3028/ih/section-206·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Not later than 1 year after the date on which a grant is made under this title, and annually thereafter, an eligible State shall submit to the Secretary a report describing— the uses of funds under this title; progress made in fulfilling the requirements of the grant; with respect to participating community colleges, rates of— graduation; transfer; and attainment of recognized postsecondary credentials; the institutional reports submitted under subsection (b); the ways in which the State is communicating with institutions to— understand the barriers of students, with respect to eligibility and access, to public supports; and use the information described in subparagraph
(A)to inform any changes; the ways in which the State human services agency and State board are aligning the policy goals of such agencies with the policy goals of the State higher education agency; changes in completion of secondary and postsecondary degrees for target eligible students; changes in access to, and use of, public benefits; changes in employment with respect to in-demand industry sectors and high-quality jobs; changes in rates of unemployment and underemployment; other data as provided by the State; and other data as required by the Secretary. The information described in subparagraphs
(G)through
(K)shall be disaggregated, where possible, by— race; ethnicity; and income level. Not later than 1 year after receiving a subgrant under section 204(b), and on an annual basis thereafter, an institution shall submit to the State a report describing— the uses of funds; with respect to the period beginning on the date on which a subgrant was received and ending on the date on which the report is submitted, changes in rates of— retention; and graduation; the ways in which such institution increased awareness of, and access to, public supports made available through State agencies; and the ways in which such institution made improvements to tracking data with respect to— the basic needs of students; the financial barriers of students; and the connection of students to public supports.