Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 118th Congress · H.R. 2670 (Received in Senate) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2024 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for militar... · Sec. 1855

Sec. 1855. Restrictive housing reform

1,691 words·~8 min read·/bill/118/hr/2670/rds/section-1855·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds the following: Restrictive housing takes many forms, and the experience in segregation can vary considerably depending on certain external factors, such as the length of stay, conditions of confinement, and degree of social isolation, as well as factors specific to each confined person, such as age and psychological resiliency. Confined individuals located in restrictive housing broadly express severe psychological disturbances with lasting detrimental consequences as a result of their experience in security housing units.
The Stanford Lab’s interviews revealed a range of common impairments and adverse consequences associated with long-term, indefinite incarceration. The majority of confined members endorsed feeling mood symptoms consistent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 5) diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, including depressed mood, hopelessness, anger, irritability, anhedonia, anger, fatigue, feelings of guilt, loss of appetite, and insomnia. Nearly all members also endorsed a sense of anxiety symptoms characteristic of DSM 5 diagnoses of panic disorder, traumatic stress disorders, or obsessive-compulsive disorders, such as nervousness, worry, increased heart rate and respiration, sweating, muscle tension, hyperarousal, paranoia, nightmares, intrusive thoughts, and fear of losing control.
Psychiatric symptoms and diminished capacity for socialization continue to cause psychological suffering and problems with social function for most of the men now in general population. Confined members cited emotional numbing and desensitization as some of the most common responses to living in SHU. This sense of emotional suppression and dysregulation continues to be problematic for inmates following the transition to the general population. Class members also reported significant alterations in cognition and perception.
Problems with attention, concentration, and memory were common, and described as persistent and worsening. Some of the most pronounced and enduring effects of long-term isolation appeared to have resulted from relational estrangement and social isolation; inmates frequently reported losing, over time, the motivation to seek social connection. Inmates shall be housed in the least restrictive setting necessary to ensure their own safety, as well as the safety of staff, other inmates, and the public.
The head of a military correctional facility shall clearly articulate each specific reason for an inmate’s placement and retention in restrictive housing. Each such reason shall be supported by objective evidence that such placement and retention is necessary— for prison safety or order; to prevent gang influence; for inmate or staff protection; and such other penological purpose as the head of such facility may determine is appropriate. Restrictive housing may only be used to eliminate or mitigate a specific facility threat such as a fight between inmates or the threat of imminent danger to inmates or staff.
Inmates shall remain in restrictive housing for no longer than necessary to address each specific reason for such placement. Inmates may not be placed in restrictive housing— as a form of punishment or deterrence; for low-level offenses that do not involve physical violence to staff or inmates; or for more than 5 days as a part of a routine investigation or more than 15 days as part of a non-routine investigation, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, absent documented extenuating circumstances.
An institutional review panel of a military correctional facility shall review the placement of an inmate in restrictive housing not later than 15 days after such placement and not less than every 15 days thereafter until such time as the inmate is removed from restrictive housing. The head of each military correctional facility shall make a plan for the return of the inmate to less restrictive conditions and shall share such plan with the inmate, unless sharing such plan would put the health and safety of the inmate, staff, other inmates, or the public at risk.
The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the staff of each military correctional facility is trained on use of force and restrictive housing policies not less than quarterly. The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the staff of each military correctional facility complies with restrictive housing policies and that such policies are reflected in employee evaluation systems. The Secretary of Defense shall establish in each military correctional facility a standing committee, consisting of high-level correctional officials, active or retired, to regularly evaluate existing restrictive housing policies.
Each standing committee shall— review use of force and abuse allegations to include body camera or other digital recording footage and closed-circuit video footage of any use of force or abuse allegation; submit redacted written recommendations on preventing unlawful use of force or abuse to— the Secretary of Defense; and the Committees on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Senate; and assist military correctional facilities in developing safe and effective alternatives to restrictive housing and share with other military correctional facilities best practices for use of force to ensure safety for staff and confined individuals.
Absent a compelling reason as determined by the Secretary of Defense, the head of a military correctional facility may not release inmates directly from restrictive housing to the general inmate population. The head of a military correctional facility shall consult with mental health professionals to ensure that shock of removal from isolation will not cause harm to the confined individual or the general inmate population. Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Secretary of Defense shall establish policies to:
Increase the minimum amount of time inmates in restrictive housing spend outside their cells to 3 hours per day, including weekends and holidays, and to offer enhanced in-cell opportunities. Afford to individuals in restrictive housing educational opportunities, using the minimum amount of protective restraint necessary to ensure safety of staff, population, and educational professionals. Make available to the inmates opportunities for recreation, education, clinically appropriate treatment therapies, skill-building, and social interaction with staff and other inmates.
Ensure that lower-risk individuals may conduct recreation time in such group size as the facility determines appropriate. Increase the ability of military correctional facilities to divert inmates with serious mental illness to mental health treatment programs or facilities when needed to serve the interest of the facility and the inmate. Prohibit the placement of inmates in restrictive housing during the final 180 days of the term of imprisonment of such inmate. Provide targeted re-entry programming for inmates who require restrictive housing during the such final 180-day period.
The Secretary of Defense shall post the policies established under paragraph
(1)in an area of the facility that is frequented by inmates and staff. The Secretary of Defense shall publish system-wide restrictive housing statistics, on a monthly basis, on the website of the Department of Defense and on websites for effected military correctional facilities. The statistics shall include the total number of inmates in restrictive housing, disaggregated by— the number of inmates who— remained in such housing for more than 90 days; remained in such housing for more than 180 days; and remained in such housing for more than 364 days; and the number of inmates in disciplinary segregation, administrative detention, other restrictive housing. The Secretary of Defense and the head of a military correctional facility shall— submit data on restrictive housing to the Committees on Armed Services and on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives on a quarterly basis; finalize upgrades in data collection software to improve tracking of restrictive housing inmates; and require a body camera or other digital recording instrument to be worn by correctional staff interacting with confined population in restrictive housing for any forced movement or physical interaction. In determining whether placement in restrictive housing is appropriate, it shall be presumed that an inmate shall be housed in the least restrictive setting necessary to ensure safety, and that inmates in restrictive housing shall be returned to general population as soon as it is safe to do so. In the case of a military correctional facility that violates the policy established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection (f), the Secretary may— reduce the funding provided to the violating facility by such amount as the Secretary determines appropriate and increase the amount provided to facilities in compliance by an amount that is equal to the amount of such reduction; suspend staff found to be involved in a violation of such policy with or without pay; or terminate staff found to be involved in a violation of such policy if such violation is considered substantially detrimental to the goals of such policy. Any military correctional facility or an employee of such facility accused of a violation of the policy established by the Secretary of Defense under subsection
(f)shall, after notice and an opportunity to be heard by the standing committee of such facility and subject to approval by the Secretary of Defense be subject to the relevant penalties described under paragraph (1). Any conflicted parties, as determined by the Secretary of Defense, shall recuse themselves from the proceeding before the standing committee and a new impartial member shall be appointed to the committee to serve in this capacity for the duration of the proceeding. Any conflict of interest shall be disclosed in writing and preserved within the recommendation notes. As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall revise Department of Defense Instruction 1325.07 (Administration of Military Correctional Facilities and Clemency and Parole Authority), and any related policies and guidance of the Department, to conform to the requirements of this Act. In this section: The term military correctional facility means a correctional facility established under chapter 48 of title 10, United States Code. The term inmate means a prisoner or another individual serving a term of imprisonment in a military correctional facility. The term institutional review panel means a panel composed of— the leadership of a military correctional facility; and medical professionals and mental health professionals who are employed by and work outside of such facility. The term non-routine investigation means any investigation that addresses a grave risk of safety and security of the facility, such as a riot, killing, or terror attack. The term restrictive housing means any housing in which an inmate is removed from general population housing to housing with little to no contact with others for a disciplinary purpose.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.