Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · S. 619 (Introduced in Senate) — To amend title 18, United States Code, to make the murder of a Federal, State, or local law enforcement officer a cri... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Murder of law enforcement officers

533 words·~2 min read·/bill/117/s/619/is/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Chapter 51 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: In the case of an individual who commits an offense described in section 1111 and the victim of the offense is a Federal law enforcement officer (as defined in section 2 of the Law Enforcement Congressional Badge of Bravery Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 50301 )) acting in the course of the official duties of the officer, the individual shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life. In the case of an individual who travels in interstate or foreign commerce or uses any facility interstate or foreign commerce, including the mail, telephone, radio, or television, with the intent to commit an offense described in section 1111 or who uses a weapon or instrument that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce to commit said offense, and the victim of the offense is a State or local law enforcement officer (as defined in section 2 of the Law Enforcement Congressional Badge of Bravery Act of 2008 ( 34 U.S.C. 50301 )) acting in the course of the official duties of the officer, the individual shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for life.
In determining whether a sentence of death is to be imposed on a defendant convicted of an offense described in subsection
(a)or (b), the jury, or if there is no jury, the court, shall consider, in addition to the factors described in section 3592(c), each of the following aggravating factors for which notice has been given and determine which, if any, exist: The defendant committed the offense by an act of ambush. The defendant has a prior history of advocating for or promoting acts of violence, including murder or assault, against a law enforcement officer. The defendant is a member of or affiliated with any organization that the Attorney General or other high ranking law enforcement official has determined to be an anarchist, domestic terrorist, or any other organization or group that actively promotes violence or the overthrow of the Federal Government. The offense was committed during a time and in a place when there was active organized activity against or targeting law enforcement officers. The defendant committed the offense in attempt to evade or otherwise prevent the law enforcement officer from carrying out a lawful arrest or other lawful authorized law enforcement activity. The defendant has personally made prior threats of violence against a law enforcement officer. Nothing in this section shall be construed as— indicating an intent on the part of Congress to prevent any State, any possession or Commonwealth of the United States, or the District of Columbia, from exercising jurisdiction over any offense over which the State, possession, Commonwealth, or District of Columbia would have jurisdiction in the absence of this section; or depriving State and local law enforcement agencies of responsibility for prosecuting acts that may be violations of this section and that are violations of State or local law. . The table of sections for chapter 51 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1122 the following: 1123. Murder of law enforcement officers. .
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Murder of law enforcement officers
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.