Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · S. 3617 (Introduced in Senate) — To amend the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 to modify the authority of the Office... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Authority of the United States Anti-Doping Agency with respect to the World Anti-Doping Agency

785 words·~4 min read·/bill/117/s/3617/is/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 701 of the Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 2006 ( 21 U.S.C. 2001 ) is amended— in subsection (a)— by amending paragraph
(1)to read as follows: The term United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee means the organization established by chapter 2205 of title 36, United States Code. ; by redesignating paragraphs
(1)and
(3)as paragraphs
(4)and (1), respectively, and moving the paragraphs so as to appear in numeric order; and by inserting after paragraph
(2)the following: The term independent athlete means an amateur athlete who does not serve, in any capacity, in— the International Olympic Committee; the International Paralympic Committee; an international sports federation recognized by the International Olympic Committee or the International Paralympic Committee; the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee; or the World Anti-Doping Agency. ; in subsection (b)— by striking United States Olympic Committee each place it appears and inserting United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee ; in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and by adding at the end the following: carry out responsibilities with respect to the World Anti-Doping Agency, as described in subsection (c). ; and by adding at the end the following: The Office of National Drug Control Policy, in conjunction with the United States Anti-Doping Agency, shall— use all available tools to ensure that— the World Anti-Doping Agency maintains a proper conflict-of-interest policy that prohibits an individual from serving as a member of the Executive Committee of the World Anti-Doping Agency if, during the preceding 2-year period, the individual served in any capacity for a sports federation that is or was under the jurisdiction of the World Anti-Doping Agency; and independent athletes from the United States and other democratic countries, or representatives of such athletes, have voting positions on the Executive Committee and governing bodies of the World Anti-Doping Agency, including the foundation board and all standing committees and working groups; demonstrate leadership within the global community; have strict standards that work toward countering the state-sponsored doping system of the Russian Federation and other state-sponsored, systemic fraud through doping; and work collaboratively with democratic countries. Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, in conjunction with the United States Anti-Doping Agency, shall make a determination as to whether the World Anti-Doping Agency— has a credible and independent governance model that provides for fair representation of the United States; maintains a conflict-of-interest policy described in paragraph (1)(A)(i); and allows independent athletes from the United States and other democratic countries, or representatives of such athletes, to have voting positions on the Executive Committee and governing bodies of the World Anti-Doping Agency, including the foundation board and all standing committees and working groups. In the case of a determination under subparagraph
(A)that the World Anti-Doping Agency does not have such a governance model, maintain such a conflict-of-interest policy, or allow such voting positions, the Office of National Drug Control Policy, in conjunction with the United States Anti-Doping Agency, shall— submit a request to the Government Accountability Office to indicate the amount of United States taxpayer dollars used to pay dues to the World Anti-Doping Agency; demand that the United States have fair representation in World Anti-Doping Agency, including not fewer than one representative on each of— the Executive Committee of the World Anti-Doping Agency; and any other governing body of the World Anti-Doping Agency for which the United States pays dues; and issue a report that describes the justifications, and the countries responsible, for blocking the United States from the Executive Committee of the World Anti-Doping Agency. As a condition of United States participation in the World Anti-Doping Agency— the United States shall be allotted not fewer than one seat on the Executive Committee of the World Anti-Doping Agency for as long as such Executive Committee is a representative body as structured on the date of the enactment of this subsection; and the World Anti-Doping Agency shall make a legal commitment to the Office of National Drug Control Policy and the United States Anti-Doping Agency that states there will be not fewer than one representative of the United States on such Executive Committee at all times. If such Executive Committee appoints not fewer than one representative of the United States during the one-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Office of National Drug Control Policy or the United States Anti-Doping Agency may not appeal to the World Anti-Doping Agency for a refund of dues paid during the period in which the United States did not have a representative on such Executive Committee. .
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Authority of the United States Anti-Doping Agency with respect to the World Anti-Doping Agency
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.