Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · S. 2208 (Introduced in Senate) — To require the United States International Trade Commission to investigate tariff policies relating to foreign-trade... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Findings

308 words·~1 min read·/bill/117/s/2208/is/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress makes the following findings: Expanding benefits to United States workers and businesses, reshoring critical supply chains, and creating United States based manufacturing requires analyzing tariff policies, assessing any negative impacts that tariffs may have on United States businesses and workers, and identifying the most effective policy options to correct those impacts and to revisit tariff treatment, if needed, particularly with respect to manufactured products exported from countries with which the United States has a free trade agreement in effect.
The North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act ( Public Law 103–182 ; 107 Stat. 2057) included a restriction, in section 202(a)(2)(A) of that Act, that prevented goods manufactured in foreign-trade zones from receiving preferential tariff treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement. Title VI of division O of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 ( Public Law 116–260 ) made a set of technical corrections to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act ( 19 U.S.C. 4501 et seq. ) and included the same restriction described in paragraph (2).
United States manufacturers operating in foreign-trade zones believe that that restriction removes parity with their counterparts in the equivalent of foreign-trade zones under Mexico and Canada’s export-promotion programs, which do not have a similar restriction in place. Canadian and Mexican manufacturers already enjoy advantages over United States manufacturers operating in the North American market as a result of— Mexico and Canada’s export-promotion programs and extensive networks of free trade agreements, including with the European Union and Japan; and not being subject to restrictions comparable to the unilateral restrictions on United States-based manufacturing in foreign-trade zones under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act, which were carried over from the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act.
Among other things, the advantages described in paragraph
(5)may encourage the location of manufacturing in Canada and Mexico, rather than the United States.
Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 103-182
  • 107 Stat. 2057
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Findings
Pub. L.Pub. L. 103-182
Stat.107 Stat. 2057
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.